Dr. Jewel Pookrum DIS-EASE

Dr. Jewel Pookrum DIS-EASE

Source: www.youtube.com

A GREAT LECTURE BY A POWERFUL WOMAN, SHE EXPLAINS THE DIS EASE OF THE BODY AND HOW TO OVERSTAND IT

Dr. Jewel Pookrum quote:
I clearly understand that every experience that we have is an opportunity for us to grow,and to learn more about ourselves, and truly it is an initiation into our (god- self),now please pay close attention to what I'm saying,because When you look into the dictionary if you look at the definition to what a god is, it is actually a tittle that is bestowed upon a human being. It is not the proper tittle to give to that creates all things,known and unknown to us! That's a totally different entity. And as a matter of fact god essence and (god-ship) is part of your destiny and part of your birthright.

Our history our culture our symbols are all over the word'but many of us don't know there ours! all of this! these concepts, begin with this concept,this story which is part history part mythology',but mythology is important because it represents a higher aspect of life'. myths are necessary for human kind to develop.Anthony T. Browder

'The events which transpired five thousand years ago; Five years ago or five minutes ago, have determined what will happen five minutes from now; five years From now or five thousand years from now. All history is a current event.' Dr. John Henrik Clarke

'No person is your friend who demands your silence, or denies your right to grow.' Alice Walker

'The most disastrous aspect of colonization which you are the most relunctant to release from your mind is their colonization of the image of God.' Dr. Frances Cress-Welsing


Why We Study Kemet (Egypt)

The civilization of Ancient Egypt lasted longer than the entire span of what we have come to accept as 'recorded history': over three thousand years. During these millenia the Egyptians developed a multitude of gods and goddesses, as well as esoteric practices that we are still unravelling the meaning of. Besides this, Egypt was the source of the first true monothestic religion, under the pharaoh Akhenaton. This rich tradition was mostly unknown until the early nineteenth century, when the Egyptian language was finally deciphered.

http://www.sacred-texts.com/egy/index.htmhttp://www.sacred-texts.com/egy/emec/index.htm


The Rosetta Stone (1of5).http://www.youtube.com/my_playlists?p=C329F496ED79873B

LAND OF THE GODS:

Purpose of Life and EducationThe basic Egyptian philosophical view was that every human’s purpose was to live righteously and become a God, so Egyptians spent much of their time developing their divinity. Formal education was one avenue Egyptians used to attain life’s purpose. Kemet’s scholars and priests taught the Seven Liberal Arts in the Mystery Schools to liberate the person’s soul from its bodily abode, which would allow the student to ultimately reach the level of Spiritual Consciousness.


The intention of formal education was to bring out and develop the “good” or “divine” element already inside a person. Studying Grammar, Rhetoric and Logic, for example, would remove a person’s “irrational tendencies of behavior” because these subjects were conveyors for moral development. Furthermore, the study of math and astronomy, two of the Seven Liberal Arts, not only helped students understand the dimensions of the world and universe, but it also helped to create relationships with heavenly bodies. Egyptians believed that connected to understanding how the world and universe naturally work was goodness.

Once a person becomes a God, he or she lives forever, just like Atum. Embedded in Ancient Kemet’s creation story is the idea that every person born on earth is human or mortal, and the only way one could become a God like Osiris is to live a righteous life and pass Osiris’s divine evaluation. To live righteously, one had to follow the 42 Divine Principles of Maat, the Goddess of Social Justice and Peace: “I have not lied. I have not stolen. I have not murdered…”

Importance of BalanceThe effort to maintain balance and order in their lives contributed to Egyptians’ tendency to think holistically. There was no problem with simultaneously practicing monotheism and polytheism. It was an integral part of Egyptian culture. This is evident when Akenten IV (Akhenaten IV 1370 - 1352) ascends the throne. He explicitly imposed monotheism by discarding all other Gods in favor of worshiping one God, Aten. Kemet’s influential priests disagreed with Pharaoh Akenten’s actions here. They did not understand why Akenten made this decision because monotheism was already in existence. The priests probably thought that Akenten was not only losing his sense of balance, but he was also overstating his case for monotheistic practices.

The people of Kemet studied the physical world and universe through understanding and applying math and science, but they paid just as much attention to the unseen world - the Gods, emotions and feelings. The unification of Amen and Ra is the personification of holistic thinking and the concept of balance in Kemet: Amen (hidden, unseen)-Ra (solar, sun, seen). Since Egyptians saw science and spirituality as complimentary, as well as other polar opposites, they always interpreted the world and universe through both entities.
Sources:ben-jochannan, Yosef, A.A. Black Man of the Nile and his Family. Baltimore, Md: Black Classic Press, 1989.
Jackson, John G. Man, God, and Civilization. New York, NY: Citidel Press, 1972
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sOYLjw4tO4U

"

The Greatest Story Never Told Video by CHIEF - MySpace Video

The Greatest Story Never Told Video by CHIEF - MySpace Video

Source: vids.myspace.com

The most important film online for black people.. The Greatest Story Never Told by CHIEF. Watch it on MySpace Videos.

Every experience that we have is an opportunity for us to grow ,and to learn more about ourselves and truly it is an initiation into our (god- self),now please pay close attention to what I'm saying,because When you look into the dictionary if you look at the definition to what a god is, it is actually a tittle that is bestowed upon a human being.
It is not the proper tittle to give to that creates all things,known and unknown to us!
That's a totally different entity. And as a matter of fact god essence and (god-ship) is part of your destiny and part of your birthright.Dr. Jewel Pookrum DIS-EASE
http://vids.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=vids.individual&videoid=21676852

"

NOVA | The Bible's Buried Secrets | Did God Have a Wife? | PBS

NOVA | The Bible's Buried Secrets | Did God Have a Wife? | PBS

Source: www.youtube.com

http://www.pbs.org/nova/bible In this excerpt from NOVAs two-hour special, The Bible's Buried Secrets, archeologist William Dever describes evidence that the ancient Israelite God, YHWH, had a female counterpart. ...

EVIDENCE OF THE EARLY ISRAELITES

Q: The Bible chronology puts Moses much later in time, around 1450 B.C.E. Is there archeological evidence for Moses and the mass exodus of hundreds of thousands of Israelites described in the Bible?


Dever: We have no direct archeological evidence. 'Moses' is an Egyptian name. Some of the other names in the narratives are Egyptian, and there are genuine Egyptian elements. But no one has found a text or an artifact in Egypt itself or even in the Sinai that has any direct connection. That doesn't mean it didn't happen. But I think it does mean what happened was rather more modest. And the biblical writers have enlarged the story.


Q: Is there mention of the Israelites anywhere in ancient Egyptian records?


Dever: No Egyptian text mentions the Israelites except the famous inscription of Merneptah dated to about 1206 B.C.E. But those Israelites were in Canaan; they are not in Egypt, and nothing is said about them escaping from Egypt.
-------------------------------------------------------------

NOVA | The Bible's Buried Secrets | Did God Have a Wife? | PBS
ARCHEOLOGY OF THE HEBREW BIBLE

RELIGIONS OF THE WORLDDr. Clarke was quoted as saying, “We cannot separate folklore and myth from truth. Folklore is both beautiful and essential. And myth is essential to the ego of all people. But myth is not truth. Myth is based on folklore.”He observed that it is essential that people ...tell stories that make them feel good about themselves. But in doing this there is the danger of telling someone else’s story.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6rHDYESmrCQ


Every religion is true one way or another. It is true when understood metaphorically. But when it gets stuck in its own metaphors, interpreting them as facts, then you are in trouble. Joseph Campbell
God is a metaphor for that which trancends all levels of intellectual thought. It's as simple as that. Joseph Campbell

1/13 The Bible's Buried Secrets (NOVA PBS)http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=McJX44aeMhM


ARCHEOLOGY OF THE HEBREW BIBLE
William Dever, Professor Emeritus of the University of Arizona, has investigated the archeology of the ancient Near East for more than 30 years and authored almost as many books on the subject. In the following conversation with Gary Glassman, producer of 'The Bible's Buried Secrets,' Dever describes some of the most significant archeological finds related to the Hebrew Bible, including his own hot-button discovery that the Israelites' God was linked to a female goddess called Asherah.
Editor's note: William Dever, like other academic scholars, uses the term B.C.E. (Before the Common Era) insted of B.C. (Before Christ).


PROVING THE BIBLEQ:

Have biblical archeologists traditionally tried to find evidence that events in the Bible really happened?


William Dever: From the beginnings of what we call biblical archeology, perhaps 150 years ago, scholars, mostly western scholars, have attempted to use archeological data to prove the Bible. And for a long time it was thought to work. [William Foxwell] Albright, the great father of our discipline, often spoke of the 'archeological revolution.' Well, the revolution has come but not in the way that Albright thought. The truth of the matter today is that archeology raises more questions about the historicity of the Hebrew Bible and even the New Testament than it provides answers, and that's very disturbing to some people.

But perhaps we were asking the wrong questions. I have always thought that if we resurrected someone from the past, one of the biblical writers, they would be amused, because for them it would have made no difference. I think they would have said, faith is faith is faith—take your proofs and go with them.


The fact is that archeology can never prove any of the theological suppositions of the Bible. Archeologists can often tell you what happened and when and where and how and even why. No archeologists can tell anyone what it means, and most of us don't try.

Q: Yet many people want to know whether the events of the Bible are real, historic events.

Dever: We want to make the Bible history. Many people think it has to be history or nothing. But there is no word for history in the Hebrew Bible. In other words, what did the biblical writers think they were doing? Writing objective history? No. That's a modern discipline. They were telling stories. They wanted you to know what these purported events mean.

The Bible is didactic literature; it wants to teach, not just to describe. We try to make the Bible something it is not, and that's doing an injustice to the biblical writers. They were good historians, and they could tell it the way it was when they wanted to, but their objective was always something far beyond that.

I like to point out to my undergraduate students that the Bible is not history; it's his story—Yahweh's story, God's story. [Yahweh is an ancient Israelite name for God.]


Q: Even if archeology can't prove events of the Bible, can it enhance our understanding of the Bible?


Dever: Archeology is almost the only way that we have for reconstructing a real-life context for the world out of which the Bible came, and that does bring understanding. When you think of how little we knew about the biblical world even 100 years ago and what we know today, it's astonishing.

THE FAITH OF ABRAHAMQ: According to the Bible, the first person to form a covenant with God is Abraham. He is the great patriarch. Is there archeological evidence for Abraham?

Dever: One of the first efforts of biblical archeology in the last century was to prove the historicity of the patriarchs, to locate them in a particular period in the archeological history. Today I think most archeologists would argue that there is no direct archeological proof that Abraham, for instance, ever lived. We do know a lot about pastoral nomads, we know about the Amorites' migrations from Mesopotamia to Canaan, and it's possible to see in that an Abraham-like figure somewhere around 1800 B.C.E. But there's no direct connection.

'It disturbs some people that, for the very early periods, we archeologists haven't much to say.'

Are we to become unbelievers if we can't prove that Abraham ever lived? What is the story about? It's a story about freedom and faith and risk. Does it matter exactly how Abraham and his clan left, and when they arrived in Canaan, or where they settled? What really matters is that Abraham is seen later by Jews and Christians as the father of the faithful.


Abraham moves out on faith to a land he has never seen. You have to think of how perilous the journey would have been had it really taken place. We are talking about a journey of several hundred miles around the fringes of the desert. So it's an astonishing story. Is it true? It is profoundly true, but it's not the kind of truth that archeology can directly illuminate.

Q: Why is it difficult for archeologists to find support for the accounts of the patriarchs?

Dever: It disturbs some people that, for the very early periods such as the so-called patriarchal period, we archeologists haven't much to say. The later we come in time, the firmer the ground we stand on—we have better sources. We have more written sources. We have more contemporary eyewitness sources.

For the earlier periods, we don't have any texts. Abraham might have lived around 1800 B.C.E. This is the dawn of written history or prehistory, when the archeological evidence can't easily be correlated with any external evidence, textual evidence—even if we did have it.

EVIDENCE OF THE EARLY ISRAELITES

Q: The Bible chronology puts Moses much later in time, around 1450 B.C.E. Is there archeological evidence for Moses and the mass exodus of hundreds of thousands of Israelites described in the Bible?

Dever: We have no direct archeological evidence. 'Moses' is an Egyptian name. Some of the other names in the narratives are Egyptian, and there are genuine Egyptian elements. But no one has found a text or an artifact in Egypt itself or even in the Sinai that has any direct connection. That doesn't mean it didn't happen. But I think it does mean what happened was rather more modest. And the biblical writers have enlarged the story.

Q: Is there mention of the Israelites anywhere in ancient Egyptian records?

Dever: No Egyptian text mentions the Israelites except the famous inscription of Merneptah dated to about 1206 B.C.E. But those Israelites were in Canaan; they are not in Egypt, and nothing is said about them escaping from Egypt.

Q: Tell us more about the Merneptah inscription. Why is it so famous?

Dever: It's the earliest reference we have to the Israelites. The victory stele of Pharaoh Merneptah, the son of Ramesses II, mentions a list of peoples and city-states in Canaan, and among them are the Israelites. And it's interesting that the other entities, the other ethnic groups, are described as nascent states, but the Israelites are described as 'a people.' They have not yet reached a level of state organization.

So the Egyptians, a little before 1200 B.C.E., know of a group of people somewhere in the central highlands—a loosely affiliated tribal confederation, if you will—called 'Israelites.' These are our Israelites. So this is a priceless inscription.

Q: Does archeology back up the information in the Merneptah inscription? Is there evidence of the Israelites in the central highlands of Canaan at this time?

Dever: We know today, from archeological investigation, that there were more than 300 early villages of the 13th and 12th century in the area. I call these 'proto-Israelite' villages.

Forty years ago it would have been impossible to identify the earliest Israelites archeologically. We just didn't have the evidence. And then, in a series of regional surveys, Israeli archeologists in the 1970s began to find small hilltop villages in the central hill country north and south of Jerusalem and in lower Galilee. Now we have almost 300 of them.

THE ORIGINS OF ISRAELQ: What have archeologists learned from these settlements about the early Israelites? Are there signs that the Israelites came in conquest, taking over the land from Canaanites?

Dever: The settlements were founded not on the ruins of destroyed Canaanite towns but rather on bedrock or on virgin soil. There was no evidence of armed conflict in most of these sites. Archeologists also have discovered that most of the large Canaanite towns that were supposedly destroyed by invading Israelites were either not destroyed at all or destroyed by 'Sea People'—Philistines, or others.

So gradually the old conquest model [based on the accounts of Joshua's conquests in the Bible] began to lose favor amongst scholars. Many scholars now think that most of the early Israelites were originally Canaanites, displaced Canaanites, displaced from the lowlands, from the river valleys, displaced geographically and then displaced ideologically.

So what we are dealing with is a movement of peoples but not an invasion of an armed corps from the outside. A social and economic revolution, if you will, rather than a military revolution. And it begins a slow process in which the Israelites distinguish themselves from their Canaanite ancestors, particularly in religion—with a new deity, new religious laws and customs, new ethnic markers, as we would call them today.

'It's interesting that in these hundreds of 12th-century settlements there are no temples, no palaces, no elite residences.'

Q: If the Bible's story of Joshua's conquest isn't entirely historic, what is its meaning?

Dever: Why was it told? Well, it was told because there were probably armed conflicts here and there, and these become a part of the story glorifying the career of Joshua, commander in chief of the Israelite forces. I suspect that there is a historical kernel, and there are a few sites that may well have been destroyed by these Israelites, such as Hazor in Galilee, or perhaps a site or two in the south.

Q: Were the people who became Israelites in some sense not 'the chosen people' but rather 'the choosing people'—choosing to be free of their Canaanite past?


Dever: Some liberation theologians and some archeologists have argued that early Israel was a kind of revolutionary social movement. These were people rebelling against their corrupt Canaanite overlords. In my recent book on early Israel I characterize the Israelite movement as an agrarian social reform. These are pioneers in the hill country who are fleeing the urban centers, the old Canaanite cities, which are in a process of collapse. And in particular they are throwing off the yoke of their Canaanite and Egyptian overlords. They are declaring independence.

Now, why these people were willing to take such a risk, colonizing the hill country frontier, is very difficult to know. I think there were social and economic compulsions, but I would be the first to say I think it was probably also a new religious vision.

Q: Was this an egalitarian movement?

Dever: Some have argued that early Israel was an egalitarian society, that there was no social stratification. I'm not sure any society was ever really egalitarian, but there is a sort of egalitarianism in the Hebrew Bible: 'Every man under his own fig tree, equal in the eyes of Yahweh.' It's interesting that in these hundreds of 12th-century settlements there are no temples, no palaces, no elite residences, no monumental architecture of any kind. These are farming villages in which every household is independent. I think there is a kind of primitive democracy in early Israel, which is enshrined in the vision of the good life in the Hebrew Bible.


Q: And these settlements grow, right?

Dever: Yes. These settlements are very different from the urban centers of the earlier 13th century. Something new is in the air, and I think this explains why other people join this movement. These villages will develop into the towns and the cities of the later state of Israel.

A UNITED MONARCHYQ: When did Israel become a state?

Dever: According to the biblical scheme of events, there was a United Monarchy for about a hundred years in the reigns of Saul, David, and Solomon. Then a civil war brought about the division of the country into Israel, the northern kingdom, and Judah, the southern kingdom. Now, some skeptics today have argued that there was no such thing as a United Monarchy. In short, there was no David.

However, in 1993 an inscription was found at Tel Dan. It mentions a dynasty of David. And on the Mesha stone found in the last century in Moab there is also a probable reference to David. So there is textual evidence outside the Bible for these kings of the United Monarchy, at least David.


Most of us mainstream archeologists also have now dated a series of monumental royal constructions to the 10th century—the famous gates at Hazor and Megiddo and Gezer. And we have in the Bible, in First Kings 9:15-17, the famous description of Solomon's construction of gates of Jerusalem, Hazor, Megiddo, and Gezer. So I would argue for a 10th-century United Monarchy.

Q: The Bible describes it as a glorious kingdom stretching from Egypt to Mesopotamia. Does archeology back up these descriptions?


Dever: The stories of Solomon are larger than life. According to the stories, Solomon imported 100,000 workers from what is now Lebanon. Well, the whole population of Israel probably wasn't 100,000 in the 10th century. Everything Solomon touched turned to gold. In the minds of the biblical writers, of course, David and Solomon are ideal kings chosen by Yahweh. So they glorify them.

Now, archeology can't either prove or disprove the stories. But I think most archeologists today would argue that the United Monarchy was not much more than a kind of hill-country chiefdom. It was very small-scale

Q: Does archeology in Jerusalem itself reveal anything about the Kingdom of David and Solomon?


Dever: We haven't had much of an opportunity to excavate in Jerusalem. It's a living city, not an archeological site. But we have a growing collection of evidence—monumental buildings that most of us would date to the 10th century, including the new so-called Palace of David. Having seen it with the excavator, it is certainly monumental. Whether it's a palace or an administrative center or a combination of both or a kind of citadel remains to be seen.

Hear the excavator herself, Eilat Mazar, describe the Palace of David.]

THE ISRAELITES' MANY GODS
Q: The Bible would have us think that all Israelites embraced monotheism relatively early, from Moses's time on. Is that contrary to what archeology has found?

Dever: The portrait of Israelite religion in the Hebrew Bible is the ideal, the ideal in the minds of those few who wrote the Bible—the elites, the Yahwists, the monotheists. But it's not the ideal for most people. And archeology deals with the ordinary, forgotten folk of ancient Israel who have no voice in the Bible. There is a wonderful phrase in Daniel Chapter 12: 'For all those who sleep in the dust.' Archeology brings them to light and allows them to speak. And most of them were not orthodox believers

However, we should have guessed already that polytheism was the norm and not monotheism from the biblical denunciations of it. It was real and a threat as far as those who wrote the Bible were concerned. And today archeology has illuminated what we could call 'folk religion' in an astonishing manner.

'The so-called folk religion even penetrated the Temple in Jerusalem.'

Q: One of the astonishing things is your discovery of Yahweh's connection to Asherah. Tell us about that.

Dever: In 1968, I discovered an inscription in a cemetery west of Hebron, in the hill country, at the site of Khirbet el-Qôm, a Hebrew inscription of the 8th century B.C.E. It gives the name of the deceased, and it says 'blessed may he be by Yahweh'—that's good biblical Hebrew—but it says 'by Yahweh and his Asherah.'

Asherah is the name of the old Canaanite Mother Goddess, the consort of El, the principal deity of the Canaanite pantheon. So why is a Hebrew inscription mentioning Yahweh in connection with the Canaanite Mother Goddess? Well, in popular religion they were a pair.

The Israelite prophets and reformers denounce the Mother Goddess and all the other gods and goddesses of Canaan. But I think Asherah was widely venerated in ancient Israel. If you look at Second Kings 23, which describes the reforms of King Josiah in the late 7th century, he talks about purging the Temple of all the cult paraphernalia of Asherah. So the so-called folk religion even penetrated the Temple in Jerusalem.

Q: Is there other evidence linking Asherah to Yahweh?

Dever: In the 1970s, Israeli archeologists digging in Kuntillet Ajrud in the Sinai found a little desert fort of the same period, and lo and behold, we have 'Yahweh and Asherah' all over the place in the Hebrew inscriptions.


Q: Are there any images of Asherah?


Dever: For a hundred years now we have known of little terracotta female figurines. They show a nude female; the sexual organs are not represented but the breasts are. They are found in tombs, they are found in households, they are found everywhere. There are thousands of them. They date all the way from the 10th century to the early 6th century.

They have long been connected with one goddess or another, but many scholars are still hesitant to come to a conclusion. I think they are representations of Asherah, so I call them Asherah figurines.

Q: There aren't such representations of Yahweh, are there?

Dever: No. Now, why is it that you could model the female deity but not the male deity? Well, I think the First and Second Commandments by now were taken pretty seriously. You just don't portray Yahweh, the male deity, but the Mother Goddess is okay. But his consort is probably a lesser deity.

We found molds for making Asherah figurines, mass-producing them, in village shrines. So probably almost everybody had one of these figurines, and they surely have something to do with fertility. They were no doubt used to pray for conceiving a child and bearing the child safely and nursing it. It's interesting to me that the Israelite and Judean ones are rather more modest than the Canaanite ones, which are right in your face. The Israelite and Judean ones mostly show a nursing mother.

Q: This has been something of a lightning rod, has it not?

Dever: This is awkward for some people, the notion that Israelite religion was not exclusively monotheistic. But we know now that it wasn't. Monotheism was a late development. Not until the Babylonian Exile and beyond does Israelite and Judean religion—Judaism—become monotheistic

THE IMPROBABLE RISE OF JUDAISMQ: Does archeology have evidence of the destruction of Jerusalem by the Babylonians?

Dever: When it comes to destructions that might be illuminated by archeology, none would be more important than the destruction of Jerusalem and the Temple in 586 B.C.E. by the Babylonians. Unfortunately, we don't have a lot of direct archeological evidence because we have never been able to excavate large areas in Jerusalem. The late Israeli archeologist Yigal Shiloh found a huge accumulation of debris on the east side of the Temple Mount, cascaded down the hill. So there is some evidence, not yet well-published. Of course, the Temple Mount has never been excavated and never will be.

That doesn't mean that that the destruction didn't take place and that it wasn't a watershed event. One would have thought at that time that it was the end of the people of Israel—with elites carried away into captivity and ordinary people impoverished. It would have seemed to have been the end, but it was rather the beginning. Because it was in exile, precisely, that those who wrote the Bible looked back, collected the archives they had, rethought it all, reformulated it, and out of that intellectual reconstruction comes early Judaism.

Q: It seems astonishing that after this defeat the Israelites could stay faithful to their god.


ever: In every age of disbelief, one is inclined to think that God is dead. And surely those who survived the fall of Jerusalem must have thought so. After all, how could God allow his Temple, his house—the visible sign of his presence amongst his people—to be destroyed? What did we do wrong? It's out of this that comes the reflection that polytheism was our downfall. There is, after all, only one God. And this radical belief in a single God who governs history becomes the heart of Judaism.

Learn more about the Foundation of Judaism in this interview with Shaye Cohen.]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yvg2EZAEw5c&feature=PlayList&p=D77183BDF7C5D25C&index=0

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/bible/dever.html


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=McJX44aeMhM

"

Nietzsche v. Jesus Christ

Nietzsche v. Jesus Christ

Source: vimeo.com

Dallas Willard Stanford University 2002

'Every animal ... instinctively strives for an optimum of favorable conditions under which it can expend all its strength and achieve its maximal feeling of power; every animal abhors, just as instinctively and with a subtlety of discernment that is 'higher than all reason,' every kind of intrusion or hindrance that obstructs or could obstruct this path to the optimum (I am not speaking of its path to happiness, but its path to power, to action, to the most powerful activity, and in most cases actually its path to unhappiness).'

The first Christian. All the world still believes in the authorship of the 'Holy Spirit' or is at least still affected by this belief: when one opens the Bible one does so for 'edification.'... That it also tells the story of one of the most ambitious and obtrusive of souls, of a head as superstitious as it was crafty, the story of the apostle Paul--who knows this , except a few scholars? Without this strange story, however, without the confusions and storms of such a head, such a soul, there would be no Christianity...That the ship of Christianity threw overboard a good deal of its Jewish ballast, that it went, and was able to go, among the pagans--that was due to this one man, a very tortured, very pitiful, very unpleasant man, unpleasant even to himself. He suffered from a fixed idea--or more precisely, from a fixed, ever-present, never-resting question: what about the Jewish law? and particularly the fulfillment of this law? In his youth he had himself wanted to satisfy it, with a ravenous hunger for this highest distinction which the Jews could conceive - this people who were propelled higher than any other people by the imagination of the ethically sublime, and who alone succeeded in creating a holy god together with the idea of sin as a transgression against this holiness. Paul became the fanatical defender of this god and his law and guardian of his honor; at the same time, in the struggle against the transgressors and doubters, lying in wait for them, he became increasingly harsh and evilly disposed towards them, and inclined towards the most extreme punishments. And now he found that--hot-headed, sensual, melancholy, malignant in his hatred as he was-- he was himself unable to fulfill the law; indeed, and this seemed strangest to him, his extravagant lust to domineer provoked him continually to transgress the law, and he had to yield to this thorn.Is it really his 'carnal nature' that makes him transgress again and again? And not rather, as he himself suspected later, behind it the law itself, which must constantly prove itself unfulfillable and which lures him to transgression with irresistable charm? But at that time he did not yet have this way out. He had much on his conscience - he hints at hostility, murder, magic, idolatry, lewdness, drunkenness, and pleasure in dissolute carousing - and... moments came when he said to himself:'It is all in vain; the torture of the unfulfilled law cannot be overcome.'... The law was the cross to which he felt himself nailed: how he hated it! how he searched for some means to annihilate it--not to fulfill it any more himself!And finally the saving thought struck him,... 'It is unreasonable to persecute this Jesus! Here after all is the way out; here is the perfect revenge; here and nowhere else I have and hold the annihilator of the law!'... Until then the ignominious death had seemed to him the chief argument against the Messianic claim of which the new doctrine spoke: but what if it were necessary to get rid of the law?The tremendous consequences of this idea, of this solution of the riddle, spin before his eyes; at one stroke he becomes the happiest man; the destiny of the Jews--no, of all men--seems to him to be tied to this idea, to this second of its sudden illumination; he has the thought of thoughts, the key of keys, the light of lights; it is around him that all history must revolve henceforth. For he is from now on the teacher of the annihilation of the law...This is the first Christian, the inventor of Christianity. Until then there were only a few Jewish sectarians.
from Nietzsche's Daybreak, s.68, Walter Kaufmann transl.


people damnation has been decreed from eternity, and that this beautiful world plan was instituted to reveal the glory of God: heaven and hell and humanity are thus supposed to exist - to satisfy the vanity of God! What cruel and insatiable vanity must have flared in the soul of the man who thought this up first, or second. Paul has remained Saul after all - the persecutor of God.
from Nietzsche's The Wanderer and his Shadow, R.J. Hollingdale transl.

The everyday Christian. -- If the Christian dogmas of a revengeful God, universal sinfulness, election by divine grace and the danger of eternal damnation were true, it would be a sign of weak-mindedness and lack of character not to become a priest, apostle or hermit and, in fear and trembling, to work solely on one's own salvation; it would be senseless to lose sight of ones eternal advantage for the sake of temporal comfort. If we may assume that these things are at any rate believed true, then the everyday Christian cuts a miserable figure; he is a man who really cannot count to three, and who precisely on account of his spiritual imbecility does not deserve to be punished so harshly as Christianity promises to punish him.
from Nietzsche's Human, all too Human, s.116, R.J. Hollingdale transl.

What a crude intellect is good for.-- The Christian church is an encyclopaedia of prehistoric cults and conceptions of the most diverse origin, and that is why it is so capable of proselytizing: it always could, and it can still go wherever it pleases and it always found, and always finds something similar to itself to which it can adapt itself and gradually impose upon it a Christian meaning. It is not what is Christian in it, but the universal heathen character of its usages, which has favored the spread of this world-religion; its ideas, rooted in both the Jewish and the Hellenic worlds, have from the first known how to raise themselves above national and racial niceties and exclusiveness as though these were merely prejudices. One may admire this power of causing the most various elements to coalesce, but one must not forget the contemptible quality that adheres to this power: the astonishing crudeness and self-satisfiedness of the church's intellect during the time it was in process of formation, which permitted it to accept any food and to digest opposites like pebbles.
from Nietzsche's Daybreak,s. 70, R.J. Hollingdale transl.


Doubt as sin.-- Christianity has done its utmost to close the circle and declared even doubt to be sin. One is supposed to be cast into belief without reason, by a miracle, and from then on to swim in it as in the brightest and least ambiguous of elements: even a glance towards land, even the thought that one perhaps exists for something else as well as swimming, even the slightest impulse of our amphibious nature- is sin! And notice that all this means that the foundation of belief and all reflection on its origin is likewise excluded as sinful. What is wanted are blindness and intoxication and an eternal song over the waves in which reason has drowned.
from Nietzsche's Daybreak,s. 89, R.J. Hollingdale transl

Other fears, other securities.-- Christianity had brought into life a quite novel and limitless perilousness, and therewith quite novel securities, pleasures, recreations and evaluations of all things. Our century denies this perilousness, and does so with a good conscience: and yet it continues to drag along with it the old habits of Christian security, Christian enjoyment, recreation, evaluation! It even drags them into its noblest arts and philosophies! How worn out and feeble, how insipid and awkward, how arbitrarily fanatical and, above all, how insecure all this must appear, now that the fearful antithesis to it, the omnipresent fear of the Christian for his eternal salvation, has been lost.
from Nietzsche's Daybreak,s. 57, R.J. Hollingdale transl.


What distinguishes us [scientists] from the pious and the believers is not the quality but the quantity of belief and piety; we are contented with less. But if the former should challenge us: then be contented and appear to be contented! - then we might easily reply: 'We are, indeed, not among the least contented. You, however, if your belief makes you blessed then appear to be blessed! Your faces have always been more injurious to your belief than our objections have! If these glad tidings of your Bible were written on your faces, you would not need to insist so obstinately on the authority of that book... As things are, however, all your apologies for Christianity have their roots in your lack of Christianity; with your defence plea you inscribe your own bill of indictment.
from Nietzsche's Assorted Opinions and Maxims,s. 98, R.J. Hollingdale transl..

Christianity's Destiny
Historical refutation as the definitive refutation.-- In former times, one sought to prove that there is no God - today one indicates how the belief that there is a God arose and how this belief acquired its weight and importance: a counter-proof that there is no God thereby becomes superfluous.- When in former times one had refuted the 'proofs of the existence of God' put forward, there always remained the doubt whether better proofs might not be adduced than those just refuted: in those days atheists did not know how to make a clean sweep.
from Nietzsche's Daybreak,s. 95, R.J. Hollingdale transl.

But in the end one also has to understand that the needs that religion has satisfied and philosophy is now supposed to satisfy are not immutable; they can be weakened and exterminated. Consider, for example, that Christian distress of mind that comes from sighing over ones inner depravity and care for ones salvation - all concepts originating in nothing but errors of reason and deserving, not satisfaction, but obliteration.
from Nietzsche's Human, all too Human, s.27, R.J. Hollingdale transl.

Destiny of Christianity. -- Christianity came into existence in order to lighten the heart; but now it has first to burden the heart so as afterwards to be able to lighten it. Consequently it shall perish.
from Nietzsche's Human, all too Human, s.119, R.J. Hollingdale transl.

At the deathbed of Christianity.-- Really unreflective people are now inwardly without Christianity, and the more moderate and reflective people of the intellectual middle class now possess only an adapted, that is to say marvelously simplified Christianity. A god who in his love arranges everything in a manner that in the end will be best for us; a god who gives to us and takes from us our virtue and our happiness, so that as a whole all is meet and fit and there is no reason for us to take life sadly, let alone exclaim against it; in short, resignation and modest demands elevated to godhead - that is the best and most vital thing that still remains of Christianity. But one should notice that Christianity has thus crossed over into a gentle moralism: it is not so much 'God, freedom and immortality' that have remained, as benevolence and decency of disposition, and the belief that in the whole universe too benevolence and decency of disposition prevail: it is the euthanasia of Christianity.
from Nietzsche's Daybreak,s. 92, R.J. Hollingdale transl.

After Buddha was dead, his shadow was still shown for centuries in a cave - a tremendous, gruesome shadow. God is dead; but given the way of men, there may still be caves for thousands of years in which his shadow will be shown. -And we- we still have to vanquish his shadow, too.
from Nietzsche's The Gay Science, s.108, Walter Kaufmann transl.

http://vimeo.com/9026959

"

Nature of the threat

Nature of the threat

Source: www.youtube.com

time for a history lesson by ras kass...what do you think about the track? I say that 95% of it is true.

Nature Of The Threat! - by Ras Kass!

Let freedom ring with a buckshot, but not just yet First we need to truly understand the nature of the threat And a pale man walks in the threshold of darkness Roughly 20,000 years ago the first humans evolved With the phenotypical trait, genetic recessive Blue eyes, blonde hair and white skin Albinism apparently was a sin to the original man, Africans So the mutants traveled North of the equator Called Europeans later, the first race haters So here's the Devil's alpha to the beta Cause history's best qualified to teach one Quoting German philosopher Schopenhauer "Every white man is a faded or a bleached one" Migration created further mutation Genetic drifts, evolution through recombination Adaptation to the climate As the Caucus Mountain man reverted to that of a primate Savage Neanderthals, until the late Paleolithic age That's when the Black Grimaldi man came With the symbol of the dragon, fire and art Check cave paintings in France and Spain to the Venus of Willendorf Around 2000 B.C. Southern Russians migrate in small units Those who travel West populated Europe Those who went East settled in Iran, known as Aryans 1500 B.C. some crossed the Khyber Pass into India and Created Hinduism, the first caste system, the origins of racism A white dot on the forehead meant elite The black dot - defeat; untrustable, untouchables They wrote the holy Vedas in Sanskrit That's the language that created Greek, German, Latin and English Now the Minoans around 2000 B.C. Starts on the island of Crete, in the Agean Sea The Greek culture begins Western Civilization But "Western Civilization" means "White Domination" Myceneans learned from Kemet, called Egypt in Greek It existed since at least 3000 B.C. Creatin geometry and astronomy This knowledge influenced Plato, Socrates and Hippocrates Cause Imhotep, the real real father of medicine Was worshiped in Greece and Rome in the form of a Black African The word Africa comes from the Greek "Aphrike" Meaning "without cold"; the word philosophy means "love of knowledge" Stole from first man, Greek power expands The first Greek fraternities band The word gymnasium is Greek for "naked" This was the place where adolescent boys were educated, and molested This was accepted because Greek culture was homosexual For example, Sappho trained girls on the island of Lesbos Hence, the word lesbian (Ay let these dumb fools know) December 25th, the birth of Saturn A homosexual god, now check the historical pattern December 25, now thought the birth of Christ Was Saturnalia, when men got drunk, mated each other then beat their wife Fact is, it was still practiced, til they called it Christmas So put a gerbil on your Christmas list The Hellenistic Era, Alexander the Great Conquers all the way to India leavin four successor states By the Fifth century B.C., R.O.M.E. Succeeds to be the conqueror of Egypt and Greece But had the threat of the Black Phoenicians in Sicily The Punic Wars began 264 B.C. The Black general Hannibal and Carthaginian Peace In 146 B.C. Carthage fell after a six-month siege Rome sold every citizen to slavery The first genocide of history And more bisexuality in sight; Julius Caesar was known as "every woman's husband and every man's wife" (BEOTCH!) Spartacus Revolt, a slave rebellion that lost Where 6,000 slaves was nailed on a cross Cross? Aw, shit! Jesus Christ! Time for some-act-right Christians get your facts right Cause Christ was not his name That's Greek for "One who is anointed" Yahshua Ben Yosef was his name, do Christians know this? So who do you praise, do you know his name? Or do you do this in vain? Accepting the religion they gave slaves to behave Peep the description of historian Josephus "Short, dark, with an underdeveloped beard was Jesus" He had the Romans fearing revolution The solution was to take him to court and falsely accuse him After being murdered by Pilate how can it be These same white Romans established Christianity Constantine would later see the cross in a dream In his vision, it read "En Hawk Signo Wonka": "In this sign we conquer" - Manifest Destiny In 325 he convened the Nicean Creed And separated god into three Decided Jesus was born on December 25th And raised then on the third day is a myth Plus to deceive us Commissioned Michelangelo to paint white pictures of Jesus He used his aunt, uncle, and nephew Subconsciously that affects you It makes you put white people closer to God (Yo, 'The Man' got game like a mot&&cker!) True indeed, fUUk it, Jihad In the eight century Muslims conquered Spain, Portugal and France and controlled it for 700 years They never mention this in history class Cause o'fays are threatened when you get the real lesson Moors from Baghdad, Turkey threatened European Christians Meaning, the white way of life; hence the Crusades for Christ On November 25th, 1491 Santiago defeats the last Muslim stronghold, Grenada King Ferdinand gave thanks to God for victory And the Pope of Rome and declared this date to forever be A day of "Thanksgiving" for all European Christians
.. Now listen, when you celebrate 'Thanksgiving' What you are actually celebratin Is the proclamation of the Pope of Rome Who later, in league with Queen Isabella Sent Cardinal Ximenos to Spain To murder any blacks that resisted Christianity These Moors, these black men and women Were from Baghdad, Turkey And today, you eat the turkey, for your 'Thanksgiving' day As the European Powers destroyed the Turkeys Who were the forefathers of your mothers and fathers Now fight the power, you stup** ni**az!
Now around this time, Whites started callings us Negroes That's Spanish for black object meaning we're not really people But property, and the triangle trade begins - they seize us Queen Elizabeth sends the first slaves on a ship named Jesus Stealin land from the indigenous natives Gave them alcohol to keep the Red Man intoxicated Whites claim they had to civilize these pagan animals But up until 1848 there's documented cases Of whites bein the savage cannibals, eatin Indians In 1992, it's Jeffery Dahmer They slaughtered a whole race with guns Drugs, priests and nuns 1763, the first demonic tactic of biological warfare As tokens of peace, Sir Jeffery Amherst Passed out clothin and blankets to the Indian community Infested with small pox, knowin they had no immunity Today it's AIDS, you best believe it's man made Cause ain't a damn thing changed.. let me explain Now since people of color are genetically dominant And Caucasoids are genetically recessive And Whites expect to be predominant, meaning survive as a race then They simply must, take precautions That's why they're worried about their future now 'cause by 2050, almost all the Earth's population Will be brown, then black, so understandin that, whites counterreact (I'm sayin.. man.. them fools ain't nothin but a teaspoon of milk in the world color majority) So they created a system To force blacks into an unnatural position That re-enforces the position of natural inferiority In addition, created guns and developed the ethnocentric view That God justifies every fuckin thing they do Condition people to perceive whites' culture as civilized And every other culture considered primitive - not true! Racism is the system of racial subjugation against nonwhites In every areas of human relation Entertainment, education, labor, politics Law, religion, sex, war and economics See blacks were 3/5ths of a man with tax purposes intended You think you're Afro-American? You're a 14th amendment and a good nig*a Jews don't salute the f*cking swastika But niggaz pledge allegiance to the flag that accosted ya They never teach about the break of islands like Jamaica But before slaves came here whites would take a Pregnant women, hang her from a tree by her toes Slice her stomach with a knife And let the unborn baby fall to the flo' And stop an unborn child in front of all the slaves To inbreed fear, so they'd be scared and behave And not rebel more Understand all whites must be perceived as potential predators I paraphrase historian Ishakamusa Barashango 'Understand that regardless of the lofty ideas ingraved on paper in such documents as the Constitution or Declaration the basic nature.. of the European American white man remains virtually unchanged'.. so check This is the nature of the threat


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pKUrQMYMv04&feature=related

"

EUROPEAN IMPERIALISM IN AFRICA

EUROPEAN IMPERIALISM IN AFRICA

Source: www.youtube.com

European Imperialism in Africa

Your God is not God (MISSIONARIES)
EUROPEAN IMPERIALISM IN AFRICA

man who believes in God can never find God. If you are open to reality, there can be no belief in reality. If you are open to the unknown, there can be no belief in it. After all, belief is a form of self-protection, and only a petty mind can believe in God.

Look at the belief of the aviators during the war who said God was their companion? as they were dropping bombs! So you believe in God when you kill, when you are exploiting people.

You worship God and go on ruthlessly extorting money, supporting the army-yet you say you believe in mercy, compassion, kindliness.
As long as belief exists, there can never be the unknown; you cannot think about the unknown, thought cannot measure it.

The mind is the product of the past, it is the result of yesterday, and can such a mind be open to the unknown? It can only project an image, but that projection is not real; so your god is not God - it is an image of your own making, an image of your own gratification.

There can be reality only when the mind understands the total process of itself and comes to an end. When the mind is completely empty - only then is it capable of receiving the unknown.

The mind is not purged? until it understands the content of relationship-its relationship with property, with people-until it has established the right relationship with everything. Until it understands the whole process of conflict in relationship, the mind cannot be free.

Only when the mind is wholly silent, completely inactive, not projecting, when it is not seeking and is utterly still, only then that, which is eternal and timeless, comes into being.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OJe1W_HIWmA&feature=related

"

TOTAL RECALL

TOTAL RECALL

Source: www.youtube.com

OUR ANCESTORS IS TALKING TO US WE BETTER LISTEN ,NO ELECTION IS GOING TO SAVE US,THE UNIVERSE IS ALIGNING AND TIME FOR US TO ALIGN OUR THOUGHTS AND ACTIONS WITH THE UNIVERSE,AND LET THE BULLSHIT AND MUNDANE ...

'The events which transpired five thousand years ago; Five years ago or five minutes ago, have determined what will happen five minutes from now; five years From now or five thousand years from now. All history is a current event.' Dr. John Henrik Clarke
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3wwTtZH3Sjs

"

Deuteronomy 21:10-14 - PassageLookup - King James Version - BibleGateway.com

Deuteronomy 21:10-14 - PassageLookup - King James Version - BibleGateway.com

Source: www.biblegateway.com

When thou goest forth to war against thine enemies, and the LORD thy God hath delivered them into thine hands, and thou hast taken them captive, And

Deuteronomy 21:10-14 (King James Version)
10. When thou goest forth to war against thine enemies, and the LORD thy God hath delivered them into thine hands, and thou hast taken them captive,
11And seest among the captives a beautiful woman, and hast a desire unto her, that thou wouldest have her to thy wife;
12Then thou shalt bring her home to thine house, and she shall shave her head, and pare her nails;
13. And she shall put the raiment of her captivity from off her, and shall remain in thine house, and bewail her father and her mother a full month: and after that thou shalt go in unto her, and be her husband, and she shall be thy wife.
14. And it shall be, if thou have no delight in her, then thou shalt let her go whither she will; but thou shalt not sell her at all for money, thou shalt not make merchandise of her, because thou hast humbled her.
http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Deuteronomy+21%3A10-14&version=KJV

"

RA UN NEFER AMEN

RA UN NEFER AMEN

Source: www.youtube.com

This is a good book to read and study for yourself! I thought i would share some of it with you RA UN NEFER AMEN

Deuteronomy 21:10-14 (King James Version) THE SUBJECT OF GOD AND WAR:

10. When thou goest forth to war against thine enemies, and the LORD thy God hath delivered them into thine hands, and thou hast taken them captive,


11. And seest among the captives a beautiful woman, and hast a desire unto her, that thou wouldest have her to thy wife;


12. Then thou shalt bring her home to thine house, and she shall shave her head, and pare her nails;


13. And she shall put the raiment of her captivity from off her, and shall remain in thine house, and bewail her father and her mother a full month: and after that thou shalt go in unto her, and be her husband, and she shall be thy wife.


14. And it shall be, if thou have no delight in her, then thou shalt let her go whither she will; but thou shalt not sell her at all for money, thou shalt not make merchandise of her, because thou hast humbled her.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FDiZCWp6zUU

"

Beliefs: Total Lie or Blind Faith? Truth & Spirituality

Beliefs: Total Lie or Blind Faith? Truth & Spirituality

Source: www.youtube.com

http://www.siddhayatan.org http://www.yogeeshashram.org http://www.siddhalishree.com (blog) Is belief blind faith or a total lie? Acharya Shree Yogeesh answers, neither one. He continues to say that all beliefs are false, not necessarily a total lie. ...

Is belief blind faith or a total lie?
Acharya Shree Yogeesh answers, neither one. He continues to say that all beliefs are false, not necessarily a total lie.Excerpt from transcription:'When people believe blindly in God, spiritual teachers, or religious teachers, they are wrong.

Merely believing doesn't work. It means you are borrowing from someone else, because it is not your view, thoughts, perception, or own thinking. How do you know, unless it is yours, if something is false or true?Believing in God doesn't make you a good person.

Maybe you are afraid of God, God-feared, that if you do something bad, you will go to hell. This only shows your fear.Believing in God doesn't mean knowing God.All beliefs are false.

Today you believe in your parents, when you grow up, your beliefs change because your time is different. You have a generation gap.Beliefs change according to the time.God lives in your own heart. Know that God within, and leave your beliefs behind and know.'
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I6O-mEMYS6M

"

ABC News Special (1989): Black in White America

ABC News Special (1989): Black in White America

Source: www.youtube.com

ABC News Anchors, Carole Simpson, George Strait, & Charles Thomas discuss various issues of race and racism as they affect Black Americans in a predominately white society. Broadcast Date: August 29, 1989

'The most disastrous aspect of colonization which you are the most relunctant to release from your mind is their colonization of the image of God.' Dr. Frances Cress-Welsing

'African-Americans have not yet learn that no other people have continued worshipping another's God, especially their slave master's god or gods and freed themselves from cultural and physical genocide. Why should Africans and African-Americans be the only exception to this historic reality?' Dr. Ben

"

Why Christianity is Bad, More reasons

Why Christianity is Bad, More reasons

Source: www.youtube.com

This is why christianity must be abolished... video took from: http://www.atheistresource.co.uk/freebies.html Enter: 1. http://www.skepticsannotatedbible.com 2. http://yourgodisimaginary.com/index.htm 3. http://www.evilbible.com/

Slavery
HEATHEN:

an irreligious, uncultured, or uncivilized person.–adjective3.of or pertaining to heathens; pagan.4.irreligious, uncultured, or uncivilized. While the enterprising explorers of Portugal and Spain were quick to enslave the indigenous peoples met in the New World, the Papacy was against this practice. In 1435 Pope Eugene IV issued an attack on slavery in his Papal bull Sicut Dudum which included the excommunication of all those who engage in the slave trade.

In 1537 Pope Paul III issued his own condemnation of slavery in his letter Sublimis Deus. However a form of indentured servitude was allowed, being similar to a peasants duty to his liege lord in Europe.

In the wake of Columbus landing in the New World, Pope Alexander was asked by the Spanish monarchy to confirm ownership of these found lands.[6] The bulls issued by Pope Alexander VI : 'Eximiae devotionis' (May 3, 1493), 'Inter Caetera' (May 4, 1493) and 'Dudum Siquidem (September 23, 1493), conferred similar rights to Spain in relation to the new found lands in the Americas as Nicholas had previously done in 'Romanus Pontix' and 'Dum Diveras'.[7] Morales Padron (1979) concludes that these bulls gave power to enslave the natives.

[8] Minnich (2005) asserts that this 'slave trade' was permitted to facilitate conversions to Christianity.

[9] Other historians and Vatican scholars strongly disagree with these accusations and assert that Pope Alexander VI never gave his approval of slavery.[10] Other later Popes continued to condemn slavery, such as Pope Benedict XIV in Immensa Pastorium (1741) and Pope Gregory XVI in his letter In Supremo Apostolatus (1839).Thornberry (2002) asserts that 'Inter Caetera' was applied in the 'Requeriemento' which was read to American Indians (who couldn't understand the colonizers language) before hostilities against them began. They were given the option to accept the authority of the Pope and Spanish crown or face being attacked and subjugated.[11] In 1993 the Indigenous Law Institute called on Pope John Paul II to revoke Inter Caetera and to make reparation for 'this unreasonable historical grief'. This was followed by a similar appeal in 1994 by the Parliament of World Religions'.[12]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pope_Alexander_VI
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V81LalgKqrA&feature=related

"

Christianity is slave religion!

Christianity is slave religion!

Source: www.youtube.com

Posted by a Rebel Alliance partner.

My main point here is that if you are the child of God and God is a part of you, the in your imagination God suppose to look like you. And when you accept a picture of the deity assigned to you by another people, you become the spiritual prisoners of that other people. John Henrik Clarke

"

SLAVE-Massah's-CHRISTIANITY-&-THE-OTHER-JESUS.mp4

SLAVE-Massah's-CHRISTIANITY-&-THE-OTHER-JESUS.mp4

Source: www.youtube.com

Supported By Viewers & Members Like You http://lojsociety.org/donations JUDAHITE BLACK JEWS & MESSIAH BEN JOSEPH AKA JESUS the CHRIST by Ras Iadonis Tafari Subscribe to EthiopianWorldNet: http://youtube.com/Ethiopianworldnet ...

SLAVE-Massah's-CHRISTIANITY-&-THE-OTHER-JESUS.mp4

"

Return of CHRIST - Lij TAFARI, THE MAN-CHILD or Sky Jesus (Anti-Christ)_NEW.mp4

Return of CHRIST - Lij TAFARI, THE MAN-CHILD or Sky Jesus (Anti-Christ)_NEW.mp4

Source: www.youtube.com

THE FACT is that LIJ TAFARI born 1892 of the seed of SOLOMON & the QUEEN OF THE SOUTH: H.I.M. HAILE SELASSIE I is THE ONE who JESUS OF NAZARETH prophecied of in JOHN 16 = THE SON OF MAN... CHRIST IN HIS KINGLY CHARACTER! ...

THE FACT is that LIJ TAFARI born 1892 of the seed of SOLOMON & the QUEEN OF THE SOUTH: H.I.M. HAILE SELASSIE I is THE ONE who JESUS OF NAZARETH prophecied of in JOHN 16 = THE SON OF MAN... CHRIST IN HIS KINGLY CHARACTER! Thus, is there is NO need for JESUS OF NAZARETH to be born again (Or, Re-Incarnate) on the earth because IT (THE WAY, THE TRUTH AND THE LIFE) IS FULFILLED in ADONAY YAHOSHUWA. HIS MAJESTY is the ONE who bear FAITHFUL WITNESS to the TRUE JESUS OF NAZARETH not the other blond-haired, blue-eyed, white-washed JAH-ZEUS the anti-christ blasphemed as "JEZEUS" of racist white supremacy.... Many MYSTERY BABYLON church SO-CALLED man-man ecclesiastical clergy dont teach the FULLNESS because most of them dont know the truth.

They only RITURALIZE the little they know. They dont teach the LAITY the truth and have divided the BROTHERHOOD by making themselves the 'clergy' and keeping the laity in spiritual darkness hence the blind leading the blind. CHRIST = MESSIAH = ANOINTED.... I have a QUESTION: ARE TRUE FOLLOWERS OF JESUS OF NAZARETH ANOINTED? Are they Christ ones or anointed ones? Was DAVID and the Kings of ISRAEL anointed? Were Prophets anointed?

Wasnt H.I.M. HAILE SELASSIE I also ANOINTED and SAT ON DAVID'S THRONE? Did JESUS OF NAZARETH sit on DAVID'S THRONE the first time in His 'Virgin' Birth? JESUS OF NAZARETH Prophecied that H.I.M. HAILE SELASSIE I would come as the SON OF MAN and take of HIS.... READ JOHN 16. TRUE JESUS is with HIS PEOPLE who KEEP HIS WORD and not the apostate church's catechisms and mumble-gumble....
Return of CHRIST - Lij TAFARI, THE MAN-CHILD or Sky Jesus (Anti-Christ)_NEW.mp4

Order The FULL VERSIONS at http://lojsociety.orgWant to Subscribe? Need to learn the half of the story not told till now? Visit http://lojsociety.org and/Or Sign in to www.lionofjuda.ning.com now! Sign in with your E-mail Account! Learn more about this...
http://lionofjuda.ning.com
You Are Invited To LIONOFJUDA.NING.COM Online Networks!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QQ0r8VVT84k&feature=grec

"

Cosmos Episodio 11 parte 1/7

Cosmos Episodio 11 parte 1/7

Source: www.youtube.com

Episode 11: The Persistence of Memory Contents: 1. Opening Bits, the basic units of information 2. Intelligence The diversity of life in the oceans 3. Whales Whales and their songs The disturbance of the whale communications network by humans Whale hunting 4. ...

Carl Sagan:
But the grandest creatures on the planet...the intelligent and graceful masters of the deep ocean...are the great whales.They are the largest animals ever to evolve on the planet Earth.... larger ,by far,than the dinosaur. Their ancestors were meat-eating mammals who migrated....70 million years ago in slow steps from the land into the waters. Whales ,like these humpback,are still mammals. We humans have much in common with them. Mothers suckle infants... there's a long childhood when adults teach the young... and there's a lot of play. These are mammalian characteristics. Vital if an animal is to learn.But the sea is murky. The senses of sight and smell...which work well for mammals on the land...are not much use here. So the whales evolved as extraordinary ability...to communicate by sound.For tens of millions of years,the whales had no natural enemies.And then, a new and alien and deadly creature...suddenly appeared on the placid surface of the ocean.These often noisy and occasionally deadly objects...first appeared in large numbers only a few centuries ago.They are artifaces...manufactured by land creatures... whose ancestors last lived in the oceans...350 million years ago.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Lm3be1ORmw&feature=rec-rev-rn-1r-1-HM

"

Easter - Christian or Pagan?

Easter - Christian or Pagan?

Source: www.youtube.com

Acharya S is a scholar classically educated in archaeology, history, mythology and languages. Acharya specializes in religion and mythology, critiquing and comparing them, and providing unique insights into their origins. ...

Acharya S is a scholar classically educated in archaeology, history, mythology and languages. Acharya specializes in religion and mythology, critiquing and comparing them, and providing unique insights into their origins. Although born into a Christian (Congregationalist Protestant) family, Acharya does not subscribe to any particular religion, nor is she a hardcore 'atheist.'

Acharya is the author of the controversial books 'The Christ Conspiracy: The Greatest Story Ever Sold'; 'Suns of God: Krishna, Buddha and Christ Unveiled'; 'Who Was Jesus? Fingerprints of The Christ'; and 'Christ in Egypt: The Horus-Jesus Connection.' Among other less flattering things, Acharya S has been called 'the ranking religious philosopher of our era' and 'the voice of reason amidst global chaos.' Her web site contains a wealth of information about: religion spirituality mythology archaeology history astrotheology archaeoastronomy ...
http://www.TruthBeKnown.com

"

Easter Week 2009 - Destruction and Resurrection

Easter Week 2009 - Destruction and Resurrection

Source: www.crystalinks.com

This year we celebrated Passover and Easter in the same week, along with a full moon in Libra. One message is totally clear this year. This was a time of destruction, mixed with a Knowing (a March 2009 film about destruction and rebirth) that something new will emerge from the flames of destruction....

EASTER/ It's All a Myth

Osiris, was a mythological god who was magically resurrected, as many believe was the destiny of Jesus. Would you pray to Osiris for help and guidance? Maybe if you were experiencing in the ancient Egyptian program, but in this reality, souls are programmed to connect with Jesus, or just plain God, as their saviour. Do you need a God? Do you need a saviour? Do you need to pray? Do you enjoy the energies of prayer as a means of cleansing and getting closer to a higher frequency source of creation the way people feel when they meditate and do energy work? Where is your consciousness now on a 1-10?

It's All a MythResurrection: A History of Myths Live Science - April 10, 2009 Ancient accounts tell of an important figure whose birth would be heralded by a star in the heavens, a god who would later judge the dead. He would be murdered in a betrayal by one close to him, his body hidden away - though not for long, as he would return in a miraculous resurrection to begin an eternal reign in heaven.

To his legions of followers, he (and his resurrection) came to symbolize the promise of eternal life.
The figure, Osiris, was the supreme god in ancient Egypt, only one of many pagan gods worshipped thousands of years before the birth of Jesus. Indeed, though Jesus is currently the best-known example of a resurrected figure, he is far from the only one.

Is resurrection real?
In modern times, there are a handful of documented cases of people coming back from the 'dead,' such as a condemned prisoner who somehow survived a hangman's noose (especially before the 'long drop' was implemented to snap the neck), or an avalanche victim declared dead but who later recovers.


Though these cases are often characterized as miracles, they are better understood as medical misdiagnoses, since the victims were never fully and clinically dead. Some people have recovered after their heart stopped beating or their lungs stopped working, even for an hour or more. But the most important medical criterion is brain death, from which no one has recovered.
In mythology, the phoenix bird could live for a millennium before dying, whereupon it would burn brightly and arise, reborn from its own ashes. Though Islam largely rejects the idea of resurrection, like Christianity it promises an eternal afterlife.
In Eastern religions, the popular idea of karma is closely tied to resurrection and reincarnation. The concept of karma varies somewhat among Buddhists, Hindus, and Jainists but the popular understanding is that karma assures that good things will happen to good people and bad things to bad people.

Karma in Buddhism holds that the fate of the soul is determined by its karma, its actions. Every act‹whether good or bad, no matter how insignificant‹will eventually return to the person who does it.
Most Westerners mistakenly assume the good or bad will come back during this lifetime ('what comes around goes around,' as they say), but karma says that good (and bad) deeds will be rewarded in a future life, not this one. Furthermore, everything bad that happens to you is your own fault; karma says you deserve every moment of pain, anguish, and terror in your life, as you brought it upon yourself by some evil act in an earlier lifetime.
The New Age movement is also based on a form of resurrection myth.

It is not a personal rebirth but instead a global one, a cleansing or renewal in which the antiquated, destructive old ways of thinking will be replaced by warmth and wisdom.As fantastic as the world's resurrection stories are, they can't hold a candle to the legend of a friendly rabbit who dispenses colored chicken eggs to children once a year.
http://www.crystalinks.com/easter2009.html

"

Cosmology

Cosmology

Source: cosmology.com

2. Numerical Astrophysics, Numerical Astrobiology and the Search for ExtraTerrestrial Life. Duncan Forgan, Institute for Astronomy, University of Edinburgh, Royal Observatory Edinburgh, Blackford Hill, Edinburgh, EH9 3HJ, England. Journal of Cosmology, 5, 811-817.

Table of Contents - Volume 5 The Search For Life in the Universe: Mars, Moon, Europa, Titan, Io, Encedalus, ExoPlanets, Nebular Clouds...

http://cosmology.com/

"

Origin of Life 1. Life Came From Other Planets. Myth of the Organic Soup & Abiogenesis

Origin of Life 1. Life Came From Other Planets. Myth of the Organic Soup & Abiogenesis

Source: www.youtube.com

http://Cosmology.com Origin of Life: Part 1 The Myth of the Organic Soup. Life on Earth Came From Other Planets. A documentary film by Rhawn Joseph, Ph.D. http://BrainMind.com This film does NOT promote religion or god. ...

Origin of Life 1. Life Came From Other Planets. Myth of the Organic Soup & Abiogenesis Our Ancient ancestor came from the Stars".

"

The Complexity of the Brain Documentary part 1

The Complexity of the Brain Documentary part 1

Source: www.youtube.com

WATCH THE FULL UNINTERRUPTED DOCUMENTARY HERE: http://www.fulldocumentaries.com Due to copyright, convenience and massive amount of upload time, videos are fully organized on http://www.fulldocumentaries.com ...

(3:24)The great rift valley of east Africa. Here is where the human story began. For millions of year ,Africa was the land scape of human evolution. across this terrain an ancestral people survived ,reproduced,and past of their traits from generation to generation. With out Africa 'Humanity' as we know it might never have evolved.

"

template

template

Source: africanmanifesto.com

The victors wrote our historyand in some cases change it as they saw fit. As African people we have to seek the truth to

African Manifesto
The fact is there is nothing that you can trust; and that is a terrible fact, whether you like it or not. Psychologically there is nothing in the world, that you can put your faith, your trust, or your belief in. Neither your gods, nor your science can save you, can bring you psychological certainty; and you have to accept that you can trust in absolutely nothing.1962 2nd Public Talk, BombayJ.Krishnamurti

My main point here is that if you are the child of God and God is a part of you, the in your imagination God suppose to look like you. And when you accept a picture of the deity assigned to you by another people, you become the spiritual prisoners of that other people. John Henrik Clarke

Religion is the organization of spirituality into something that became the hand maiden of conquerors. Nearly all religions were brought to people and imposed on people by conquerors, and used as the framework to control their minds. John Henrik Clarke
It was once said 'If you do not know your history, you will repeat it'
The present is defined as 500 years after Christopher Columbus. Most of the world powers today is a direct reflection of Colonalism and the Slave Trade.
Topics we need to know
Our History did not begin with the Slave Trade.
The Arab Slave Trade started first, lasted longer and was far more divistating and is still going on today.
We are scatter all over the world not just in the Americas.
Divide and Conquer is still working.
We are repeating history
We do not know our history.

The Scramble for Africa The Scramble for Africa, also known as the Race for Africa, was the proliferation of conflicting European claims to African territory during the New Imperialism period, between the 1880s and World War I in 1914.

The Europeans possessed attitudes of superiority and a sense of mission. Khapoya compares and contrasts three colonial powers: the French, the British and the Portuguese. The French were able to accept an African as French, if they gave up their African culture and adopted French ways, even including marriage with a (white) French person.

“Africans and persons of African descent must assume the primary responsibility and leadership in historical research….if we are to continue to leave practically all important historical research and writing concerning the black race to the white man, then we must be prepared to accept, uncomplainingly, the white man’s point of view.” Chancellor Williams

The victors wrote our historyand in some cases change it as they saw fit. As African people we have to seek the truth to universal harm that has been bestowed upon us. The Manifesto is an analysis of our history until the present day.With the knowledge of our ancestorial past, we will be able to unravel the confusion that have hinder our progression and, stymied and social growth.

We have to do away with the myths, misconceptions, lies and outside influence that stands in the way of our progress. Currently,there is an effort to misidentify our African heroes and there still is an effort to deliberately misconstrue the truth. Africans are scatter around the world, disconnected and embedded in different cultures and embracing other societies visions.

The MythsI am apt to suspect the Negroes...to be naturally inferior to the White. There never was acivilized nation of any other complexion than white. David Hume, European Philosopher

When we classify mankind by color, the only one of the primary races...which has not madea creative contribution to any of our twenty-one civilizations is the black race Arnold Toynbee,Historian

A Black skin means membership in a race of men which has never created a civilizationof any kind. John Burgess, Scholar

The Arab Invasion“Arab imperialism, though seldom acknowledged, has been even more devastating for African people than European imperialism; and the Arab’s white superiority complex is not one white less than that of Europeans although their strategy of ‘brotherhood’ deceives naive Blacks. The forces behind the continuous splintering of already small groups and even the breaking up of kingdoms and empires, followed by the equally endless migrations, included the steadily increasing death of the soil and the advance of the deserts; the drying up of lakes and rivers, along with the attending climatic changes and internal strife—combined with foreign invasions and famine to become a way of life. “Chancellor Williams
http://africanmanifesto.com/

"

Converting an indian to christianity - don't let the devil win

Converting an indian to christianity - don't let the devil win

Source: www.youtube.com

My friend saraa is indian and i learned about her culture and realized she needs to become christian, i wanna save her but right now its not looking so good :(.

WHAT DOES THE BIBLE TEACH WHEN SOMEONE TRY TO CONVERT A CHRISTIAN TO SERVE ATHER GODS/RELIGIONS? ALTHOUGH CHRISTIAN HAVE FORCE THEIR GOD AND RELIGIONS ON OTHERS.

Deuteronomy 13:7-12 (King James Version)
7 Namely, of the gods of the people which are round about you, nigh unto thee, or far off from thee, from the one end of the earth even unto the other end of the earth;


8Thou shalt not consent unto him, nor hearken unto him; neither shall thine eye pity him, neither shalt thou spare, neither shalt thou conceal him:


9 But thou shalt surely kill him; thine hand shall be first upon him to put him to death, and afterwards the hand of all the people.


10 And thou shalt stone him with stones, that he die; because he hath sought to thrust thee away from the LORD thy God, which brought thee out of the land of Egypt, from the house of bondage.


11 And all Israel shall hear, and fear, and shall do no more any such wickedness as this is among you.


12 If thou shalt hear say in one of thy cities, which the LORD thy God hath given thee to dwell there, saying,


Matthew 28:16-20 (New International Version)
The Great Commission
16.Then the eleven disciples went to Galilee, to the mountain where Jesus had told them to go.

17. When they saw him, they worshiped him; but some doubted.

18 Then Jesus came to them and said, 'All authority in heaven and on earth has been given to me.

19 Therefore go and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in[a] the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit,

20. and teaching them to obey everything I have commanded you. And surely I am with you always, to the very end of the age.'


Why do we depend on others, whether the others be the image in a church, or in a temple or in a mosque, or the preacher, or the psychologist, or anybody - why do we depend on others? If we do depend on others psychologically we become second hand people, which we are. The whole history of mankind is in us, the whole story of mankind is not in books - there is, in outward things but the whole history is here. And we don't know how to read that. And if we could read it - and to read it you are not the reader. You understand what I am saying? You are the book. But when you read the book as a reader it has no meaning.

But if you are the book and the book is showing you, telling you the story, and you are not telling the story but the book is telling, then you will not depend on a single person, then one will be a light to oneself. But we are all waiting for the match of another, the fire of another. And perhaps that is why you are all here.

And that is where the tragedy lies because we cannot see clearly for ourselves. And before we help others we have to see clearly, for god's sake! It is like then the blind leading the blind.

So belief brings enmity, division, destruction, and that is obviously not religion.
Then what is religion? If you have wiped the window clean - which means that you have actually stopped performing ceremonies, given up all beliefs, ceased to follow any leader or guru - then your mind, like the window, is clean, polished, and you can see out of it very clearly.

When the mind is swept clean of image of ritual, of belief, of symbol, of all words, mantrams and repetitions, and of all fear, then what you see will be the real, the timeless, the everlasting, which may be called God; but this requires enormous insight, understanding, patience, and it is only for those who really inquire into what is religion and pursue it day after day to the end.

Only such people will know what is true religion. The rest are merely mouthing words, and all their ornaments and bodily decorations, their pujas and ringing of bells - all that is just superstition without any significance. It is only when the mind is in revolt against all so-called religion that it finds the real.

We have seen that ceremonies are not religion that going to a temple is not religion, and that belief is not religion. Belief divides people. The Christians have beliefs and so are divided both from those of other beliefs and among themselves; the Hindus are everlastingly full of enmity because they believe themselves to be brahmans or non-brahmans, this or that. So belief brings enmity, division, destruction, and that is obviously not religion.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JvVAV09-dQ8&feature=email

"

The Jesus Myth

The Jesus Myth

Source: www.youtube.com

http://www.skepticalbeliefs.com - Why Jesus never existed. Have you questioned your beliefs today?

THE SUN/Of course the sun’s the light of the world. What else lights the world if it’s not the sun?
And then when you start looking at how the word S-O-N and S-U-N are interchangeable in Christianity... and God knows there’s a lot of information on that. So basically you boil down Christianity as sun worship / Astrology.

The Old Testament is Astrology / sun worship. Yahweh, as I said, was associated with the sun and the planet Saturn.

The Old Testament also talks about God as being the Sun Psalms 84:11 'the Lord God is a sun...'Deuteronomy 4:24 'For the LORD your God is a consuming fire,' (the Sun is a consuming fire.)Malachi 4:2 'the Sun of Righteousness...'

Jesus represents in the story a symbol. It’s a metaphor, and Jesus is a metaphor for the sun. And so, boiling it down, Christianity is sun worship based on astrology, because nobody owns the sun. Africans don’t own it, and we don’t own the sun, so obviously the sun belongs to God – so it’s God’s sun [and/or son] and he’s the light of the world.


There have been sun gods throughout history. Some are depicted as traveling across the sky in a vessel of some sort, like a boat, chariot, or cup. The sun god of the Greeks and Romans rode in a 4-horse (Pyrios, Aeos, Aethon, and Phlegon) chariot. The Egyptians differentiated among the aspects of the sun, and had several gods associated with it: Khepri for the rising sun, Atum, the setting, and Ra, at noon. The Greeks and Romans also had more than one sun god. It seems that most sun deities are male and counterparts to the often female moon deities, although there are goddesses of the sun and gods of the moon.

Name Nationality/Religion God or Goddess or ? NotesAmaterasu Japan Sun goddess Arinna (Hebat) Hittite (Syrian) Sun goddess The Iconography of Religion in the Hittite, Luwian, and Aramaean Kingdoms PDF

Apollo Greece and Rome Sun god
Freyr Norse Sun god Not the main Norse sun god, but a fertility god associated with the sun.
Garuda Hindu Bird God Helios (Helius)
Greece Sun God Before Apollo was the Greek sun god,
Helios held that position.
Huitzilopochtli (Uitzilopochtli) Aztec Sun God
Inti Inca Sun God
Liza West African Sun God
Lugh Celtic Sun God
Mithras Persia Sun God 'Mit(h)ra(s) and the Myths of the Sun' David H. Sick. Numen (2004).Re
(Ra) Egypt Mid-day Sun God An Egyptian god shown with a solar disk.
Center of worship was Heliopolis.
Later associated with Horus as Re-Horakhty.
Also combined with Amun as Amun-Ra, a solar creator god.Shemesh/Shepesh Ugarit Sun goddess Female solar deities (Jürg Eggler) PDFSol (Sunna) Norse Sun Goddess She rides in a horse-drawn solar chariot.Sol Invictus Roman Sun God The unconquered sun. A late Roman sun god. The title was also used of Mithras.Surya Hindu Sun God Rides the sky in a horse-drawn chariot.Tonatiuh Aztec Sun God Utu (Shamash) Mesopotamia Sun God

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K7jI-giOOMc&feature=related

"