Have an account?

Search This Blog

Sunday, May 9, 2010

Egypt: Childbirth and Children in Ancient Egypt, A Feature Tour Egypt Story

Source: www.touregypt.net
Egypt: Childbirth and Children in Ancient Egypt, A Feature Tour Egypt Story
“Study the past if you would divine the future” Confucius quotes

(A form of Mother's Day has been celebrated since ancient times.)

Michelle VaccaroIt’s that time of year again where children of all ages take the time out to honor their mother. Flowers, cards, and gifts have become a way to show appreciation on Mother’s Day, but the holiday’s origins have not always been so commercialized.
Some say Mother’s Day goes back as far as ancient Egypt, Greece, and Rome. According to MothersDayCentral.com, early signs of Mother’s Day were celebrated in Egypt to honor the goddess Isis. The Egyptians held an annual festival for Isis, the “mother of the pharaoh’s” and goddess of motherhood and fertility. The ancient Greeks celebrated Rhea, the mother of all gods, in spring ceremonies. The Romans honored Phrygian god Cybele or Magna Mater (Great Mother) in games and parades between March 15 and March 22.
http://thecelebritycafe.com/feature/birth-mother’s-day-05-07-2010

CHILDBIRTH AND CHILDREN IN ANCIENT EGYPTBY MARIE PARSONS

Children were considered a blessing in ancient Egypt. Sons and daughters took care of their parents in their old age. They were often called 'the staff of old age,' that is, one upon whom the elderly parents could depend upon for support and care. The scribe Ani instructed that children repay the devotion of Egyptian mothers:

'Repay your mother for all her care. Give her as much bread as she needs, and carry her as she carried you, for you were a heavy burden to her. When you were finally born, she still carried you on her neck and for three years she suckled you and kept you clean.'

It was also expected that the older son or child carry on the funerary provisioning of the parents after their death. Children had value in ancient Egypt. The Greeks, who were accustomed to leaving infants exposed to the elements, were stunned to observe that every baby born to Egyptian families were cared for and raised. This care was not easy. Many children died to infection and disease. There was a high rate of infant mortality, one death out of two or three births, but the number of children born to a family on average were four to six, some even having ten to fifteen.

The Kahun, Berlin and Carlsberg papyri contain an extraordinary series of tests for fertility, pregnancy and to determine the sex of the unborn child. These tests cover a wide range of procedures, including the induction of vomiting and examination of the eyes. Perhaps the most famous test says: to see if a woman will or will not bear a child. Emmer and barley, the lady should moisten with her urine every day, like dates and like sand in two bags. If they all grow, she will bear a child. If the barley grows it will be a male, if the emmer grows it will be a female, if neither grow she will not bear a child.

This technique was tested in the late 20th century, and it showed no growth of either seed when watered with male or non-pregnant female urine. With forty specimens from pregnant women, there was growth of one or both species in more than 50% of the cases. While this seemed a good indicator of pregnancy, no growth failed to exclude pregnancy in 30% of the cases. When only one species germinated, the prediction of gender was correct in seven cases, and incorrect in sixteen cases.

The god Thoth was also often called upon for help, and the goddess Hathor, guardian of women and domestic bliss, was believed to be present at every birth. Severe labor pains might be soothed by the god Amun, gently blowing in as a cool northern breeze.

The Ebers Papyrus contains a remedy for contracting the uterus, but it is not clear as to whether this was to hasten birth, expel the placenta, or to return the uterus to pre-pregnancy size. The remedy went like this: mix the kheper-wer plant (identity now unknown), honey, water of carob, milk, strain and place in the vagina.

If the perineum had an injury during birth, the Kahun Papyrus contained this remedy: prepare new oil to be soaked into her vagina.

The Egyptians were always anxious to now the future, and in order to ascertain the destiny of new-born children they relied upon the seven Hathors, who hovered over a child’s cradle and announced his destiny. Representations of these seven forms of the goddess appear in the tomb of Queen Nefertari and in various versions of the Book of Coming Forth by Day.

If a sickly baby was thought likely to die, its chances were assessed by the strength of its cries and its facial expression. A child that cries 'Hii' will live, but one that cries 'Mbi' will die. If the child made a sound like the creaking of the pine trees, or turned his face downward, he would die. Where there was still doubt, the infant was for three days put on a diet of milk containing a ground fragment of its placenta. If it did not vomit, it would survive.

The parents would lose no time in giving their child a name. Some Egyptians had very short names such as Ti or Abi, others had a complete phrase, such as Djedptahioufankh, meaning 'Ptah says he will live.' Names may have pointed to physical qualities, such as Pakamen, the blind one, or to occupations, such as Pakapu, the birdcatcher.

Most parents liked to place their children under the sponsorship of some deity, and so there were children named Hori and others named Seti, and others named Ameni, that is, dedicated to Horus, to Set, and to Amun, respectively. The historian Manetho was under the protection of the Theban deity Montu. The name Mutemwia means 'Mut is in her bark,' perhaps signifying that on the day of this girl’s birth, there was a procession of the goddess Mut, and the mother wanted to keep that special occasion by naming her daughter after the goddess.

Names could signify the god’s pleasure, perhaps explaining why there were so many Amenhoteps, Khnumhoteps and Ptahhoteps, or, signify that the god was in front of or the father of the child, as in the name Amenemhat. Those with a name Siamun were children of the god Amun. Senwosret’s name meant that he was a son of the early Theban goddess Wosret, thought to be the precursor of Mut as the consort of Amun.

After the child was named, the parents had to register it with the authorities. A princess Ahori, wife of one Nenoferkaptah, declared, 'I gave birth to this baby that you see, who was named Merab and whose name was entered into the registers of the House of Life.' Births, marriages and deaths may have been recorded for inheritance and taxation purposes. When witnesses were called in legal proceedings, their names, those of their parents, and their occupation, were all noted.

A baby stayed with its mother, carried in a sling around her neck. The mother, or a nurse, would nurse the baby for three years. Bottles, or at least the clay equivalents of bottles, have also been found.
http://www.touregypt.net/featurestories/mothers.htm
"

Evolution - Becoming Human - Birth of Humanity 1of6

Source: www.youtube.com
Evolution - Becoming Human - Birth of Humanity 1of6 Please read the description before placing a comment, thank you for all your support . If you are a creationist read the following instructions: 1st ...
The Ancient Egyptian/Christian Holy Families

The Christian religion threw away and lost the very soul of their meaning when it mistranslated the Ancient Egyptian allegorical language into alleged history, instead of viewing it as spiritual allegory. The result was a pathetic, blind faith in a kind of emotional and superstitious supernaturalism, and effectively aborted the real power of the story/allegory to transform the life of every individual. They believed IN them, in the sense that they believed in the truth beneath the stories.

The very thing that is now called the Christian religion was already in existence in Ancient Egypt, long before the adoption of the New Testament. The British Egyptologist, Sir E. A. Wallis Budge, wrote in his book, The Gods of the Egyptians [1969],
The new religion (Christianity) which was preached there by St. Mark and his immediate followers, in all essentials so closely resembled that which was the outcome of the worship of Osiris, Isis, and Horus.

The similarities, noted by Budge and everyone who has compared the Egyptian Ausar/Auset/Heru (Osiris/Isis/Horus) allegory to the Gospel story, are striking. Both accounts are practically the same, e.g. the supernatural conception, the divine birth, the struggles against the enemy in the wilderness, and the resurrection from the dead to eternal life. The main difference between the “two versions”, is that the Gospel tale is considered historical and the Ausar/Auset/Heru (Osiris/Isis/Horus) cycle is an allegory.

Allegories are intentionally chosen as a means for communicating knowledge. Allegories dramatize cosmic laws, principles, processes, relationships and functions, and express them in a way easy to understand. Once the inner meanings of the allegories have been revealed, they become marvels of simultaneous scientific and philosophical completeness and conciseness. The more they are studied, the richer they become. The ‘inner dimension’ of the teachings embedded into each story make them capable of revealing several layers of knowledge, according to the stage of development of the listener. The “secrets” are revealed as one evolves higher. The higher we get, the more we see. It is always there.

The Egyptians (Ancient and present-day Baladi) did/do not believe their allegories as historical facts.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Gwa3VRapM0
"

Genesis 2: Major Problems with Adam and Eve

Source: www.youtube.com
Forget about the snake that is punished by crawling on his belly...there are several other issues with this story!
"

Genesis 2:23-24 - PassageLookup - English Standard Version - BibleGateway.com

Source: www.biblegateway.com
Then the man said,'This at last isGenesis 29:14; Judg 9:2; 2 Sam 5:1; 19:13; Eph 5:28-30 bone of my bonesand flesh of my flesh;she shall be called
GENESIS 2:24 Therefore shall a man leave his father and his mother, and shall cleave unto his wife: and they shall be one flesh.

Genesis 2:23-24 (King James Version)
23 And Adam said, This is now bone of my bones, and flesh of my flesh: she shall be called Woman, because she was taken out of Man.
24 Therefore shall a man leave his father and his mother, and shall cleave unto his wife: and they shall be one flesh.
http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Genesis%202:23-24&version=ESV
"

Is There Intelligent Life in the Universe? | Michio Kaku | Big Think

Source: bigthink.com
content
The distances separating the stars are so vast that it would take a very advanced civilization—perhaps thousands or even millions of years more advanced than ours—to bridge those distances. In other words, any extraterrestrial civilization that visited us, hypothetically or in reality, would be using a technology that we can only dream about here on planet Earth.

Most life forms in outer space are probably microbial, but a handful of them may be advanced enough to actually reach us. Now, from their perspective, we humans are the microbial life and we would simply not be that interesting to them. I think this is one reason aliens don’t come here and say, “Take me to your leader, Earth man.” An extremely advanced civilization visiting humans would almost be like humans going down to an ant hill and telling them: 'I bring you computers, I bring you nuclear power, I bring you knowledge…' Most of the time we simply step on them instead.

So why haven't they visited or conquered us? No one knows, but I think:
* There are plenty of uninhabited planets with valuable resources to exploit, so they will likely leave us alone. * They might be benevolent since they have had thousands to millions of years to work off their aggressive tendencies. * Most likely, we are not on their radar screen. We may be too insignificant for them to make formal contact.
http://bigthink.com/ideas/19896
"

American Imperialism timeline - Part 1

Source: www.youtube.com
These are well documented historical facts summarized in order to get these events out there in the public. I apologize for not including other key facts and important roles played during these times, but there is enough information for anyone to go and do further research on the matter. ...
American Imperialism
timeline - Part 1

Deuteronomy
20:10-11 (The Message)10-15 When you come up against a city to attack
it, call out, 'Peace?' If they answer, 'Yes, peace!' and open the city
to you, then everyone found there will be conscripted as forced laborers
and work for you. But if they don't settle for peace and insist on war,
then go ahead and attack. God, your God, will give them to you. Kill
all the men with your swords. But don't kill the women and children and
animals. Everything inside the town you can take as plunder for you to
use and eat—God, your God, gives it to you. This is the way you deal
with the distant towns, the towns that don't belong to the nations at
hand.

John Henrik
Clarke, (Christopher Columbus and the Afrikan Holocaust: Slavery and the
Rise of European Capitalism ), looks at the issue from another
perspective which defines the problem, but excludes the cause (people in
power 'writing history' for their own imperialistic purposes):

'Europeans
not only began to colonize most of the world, they also colonized
information about the world. They colonized the Bible. They colonized
all complimentary images that non-European people held of themselves.
The most effective of all of these colonized images was their
colonization of the image of God. Through missionaries, adventurers,
free-booters and slave traders they began to propagate the concept that
God favored them over other people. They were saying, in essence, that
all Europeans were the chosen people of God. [...]

19 But all the
silver, and gold, and vessels of brass and iron, are consecrated unto
the LORD: they shall come into the treasury of the LORD.

20 So
the people shouted when the priests blew with the trumpets: and it came
to pass, when the people heard the sound of the trumpet, and the people
shouted with a great shout, that the wall fell down flat, so that the
people went up into the city, every man straight before him, and they
took the city.

21 And they utterly destroyed all that was in the
city, both man and woman, young and old, and ox, and sheep, and ass,
with the edge of the sword.

22 But Joshua had said unto the two
men that had spied out the country, Go into the harlot's house, and
bring out thence the woman, and all that she hath, as ye sware unto her.


23 And the young men that were spies went in, and brought out Rahab,
and her father, and her mother, and her brethren, and all that she had;
and they brought out all her kindred, and left them without the camp of
Israel.

24 And they burnt the city with fire, and all that was
therein: only the silver, and the gold, and the vessels of brass and of
iron, they put into the treasury of the house of the LORD.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W96GLQ8bpew&feature=related
"

Social Pathology | The Zeitgeist Movement | NYC 2010 ZDAY

Source: vimeo.com
Social Pathology | The Zeitgeist Movement | NYC 2010 ZDAY -Lecture by Peter Joseph *Some audio had to be replaced due to static problems. >Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License
Social Pathology | The Zeitgeist Movement | NYC 2010
ZDAY
by peter
joseph

The social order, as we know it, is created out of ideas,
either directly or as a systemic consequence.
In other words, somebody somewhere did something which generated a group interest,
which then led to the implementation of a specific social component,
either in a physical form, philosophical form, or both.
Once a given set of ideas are intrusted by a large enough group of people,
it becomes an institution.

And once that institution is made dominant in some way,
while existing for a certain period of time,
that institution can then be considered an establishment.
Institutional establishments are simply social traditions giving the illusion of permanence.

In turn, the more established they become,
the more cultural influence they tend to have on us,
including our values and hence our identities and perspectives.
It is not an exaggeration to say that the established institutions
governing a person's environment is no less than a conditioning platform
to program, if you will,
that person with a specific set of values required to maintain the establishment.

Hence, we are going to call these 'established value programs.'
I have found the analogy of computer programming to be a great way to frame this point.
While there is always a debate about genetics, an environmental influence which,
by the way, as I mentioned Roxanne Meadows will go into at length, later in the program,
it's very easy to understand in the context of values,
meaning what you think is important and not important,
that information influences or conditioning is coming from the world around you.
Make no mistake,
every intellectual concept, which each one of us finds merit with,
is the result of a cultural information influence, one way or another.
The environment is a self-perpetuating programming process,
and just like designing a software program for your computer,
each human being is, advertently and inadvertently, programmed into their world view.

To continue the analogy,
the human brain is a piece of hardware
and the environment around you constitutes the programming team
which creates the values and perspective.
Every word you know has been taught to you one way or another,
and thus, every concept and belief you have is a result of this same influence.
Jacque Fresco once asked me, 'How much of you is you?'

The answer, of course, is kind of a paradox,
for either nothing is me, or everything is me,
when it comes to the information I understand and act upon.
Information is a serial process,
meaning the only way that a human being can come up with any idea
is through taking independent information that allows that idea to be realized.
We appear to be culturally programmed from the moment we are coming to this world
to the moment we die.
And I'm not gonna' drill in it much more than that.
However, consequently, the cultural attributes we maintain as important values
are most often the ones that are reinforced by the external culture.
I'm gonna' say that again.
The most dominant cultural attributes maintained
are the ones that are reinforced by your environment.

If you are born into a society which rewards competition over collaboration,
then you most likely will adopt those values in order to survive.
The point is, we are essentially bio-chemical machines.
And while the integrity of our machine processing power
and memory is contingent, in part, on genetics,
the source of our actions come fundamentally
from the ideas and experiences installed on our mental hardware by the world around us.
However, our biological computer, the human mind,
has an evolutionarily installed operating system, if you will,
with some seemingly difficult tendencies built in
which tends to limit our objectivity and, hence, our rational thought process.
This comes in the form of emotional inclinations.

Contrary to popular belief, evidence now shows that our early human ancestors,
which predate the Neolithic Revolution,
really didn't live in a state of perpetual conflict and extreme scarcity
as many anthropologists early on had assumed.
In fact, hunter-gatherer societies were a very unique arrangement
immersed in both a restrictive yet self-regulating environmental paradigm.
Before the advent of agriculture, there was very little control over what was available.
You didn't have agriculture, you couldn't control the environment.

So, what happened is a natural balance was in order.
And the societies themselves seemed to reflect this balance by having, in fact,
non-hierarchical, noncompetitive, leaderless social structures.
In fact, it has been found that their value systems, their social values,
were essentially based on equality, altruism and sharing.
And they literally forbid upstart-ism, dominance and aggression, and egoism.
We know this today because of anthropological research done
on remaining hunter-gatherer societies around the world
such as the Piraha, which is how is pronunciated, out of Brazil.

Amazingly it appears that well over
- it is important point, for anyone that tells you that the current system is natural -
for well over 90% of the human beings' existence; human species' existence,
on this planet as we know it,
we were within social organizations that did not use money, that did not have hierarchy,
and even had 'counter-dominance strategies,'
where the majority would work together to shut down
any individual that was trying to gain power and control.

Pretty much the reverse of what we have today.
The Neolithic Revolution changed all of that.
It provided human beings with an ability to control their environment more intently.
The sustenance of life could now be cultivated essentially at will.

Now, while this advent would appear as a profound benefit to all,
it also introduced some pesky social problems
as a result of conditioning attributes which we still deal with today.
In the view of anthropologist and Professor of Neurology at Stanford University, Dr. Robert Sapolsky,
'Hunter-Gatherers have thousands of wild sources of food to subsist on.
Agriculture changed all of that,
generating an overwhelming reliance on a few dozen food sources.
Agriculture allowed for the stockpiling of surplus resources and thus, inevitably,
the unequal stockpiling of them,
stratification of society and the invention of classes.

Thus, it has allowed for the invention of poverty.'
Since this dramatic change in the structure of human society, the creation of imbalances has continued
and social stratification and income inequality are now staples of the modern world as we all know.

In fact, many who are unfamiliar with human history
would probably consider these attributes again to be part of some 'natural human order;'
it's so pervasive today.
We have gone from food cultivation, to commodity bartering, to gold exchange,
to metal-backed certificate exchange, to fiat currency.

We went from a system with values reflective of true natural processes
to a system of values based on certificates of ownership traded for income on their own,
virtually - I'd say not even virtually - completely decoupled from physical resources.

And we have come from a world based on necessity,
and social drive for preservation and sustainability,
to a world based on strategic manipulation,
pointless materialism, and obsession with property and ownership.
In the words of historian, philosopher David Hume,
'The first man who, after enclosing a piece of ground,
took it into his head to say this is mine,
and found people simple enough to believe him, was the real founder of civil society.

How many crimes, how many wars, how many murders,
how many misfortunes and horrors would that man have saved the species,
who pulling up stakes or filling up the ditches,
should have cried to his fellows: Beware of listening to this impostor.
You are lost if you forget that the fruits of the Earth belong to us all,
and the Earth itself to nobody.'

Moreover, scarcity is now a driving force for commerce.
In our system scarcity equals profit.
The less there is of something, the more it can be valued in terms of money.
In other words, abundance is a negative thing in a profit system.
In the words of anthropologist Marshall Sahlins [corrected],
'The market industrial system institutes scarcity, in a manner completely unparalleled,
and to a degree nowhere else approximated
where production and distribution are arranged through the behavior of prices,
and all livelihoods depend on getting and spending,
insufficiency of material means becomes the explicit, calculable starting point of all economic activity.'

Likewise, I'd like to point out, as a simple aside,
that the money supply in America, at all times,
has less in value than the outstanding transactions required.
In other words, there isn't and never will be,
in the American money supply or most other money supplies on the planet,
enough money in existence, at any one time,
to cover the outstanding transactions within the economy.

Money is created out of debt, through loans.
And interest is charged for those loans,
whether it's a government bond or a personal home equity loan.
If every single debt was called in right now in our economy
there would be enormous amount of money that is literally impossible
to payback in domestic currency.
http://vimeo.com/10707453
"

MALCOLM X: I Have No Fear Whatsoever of Anybody or Anything

Source: www.youtube.com
http://malcolmxfiles.blogspot.com/ Malcolm X explains why he was forced out of the Nation of Islam and that he has a rifle for protection. After he left the Nation and made the pilgrimage to Mecca, he ...
Truth is a Pathless Land
by J. Krishnamurti

You cannot build a new world in the way you are doing it now. It is obvious that the method of training laboriously a few chosen disciples will not make any difference to humanity. No doubt you will leave a mark like Krishna, Buddhist Christ, Mohammed and Gandhiji. But they have not changed the world; nor will you, unless you discover an entirely new way of approaching the problem.

The devil and his friend went out for a stroll and noticed a man walking in front of them pick something up, then dance with joy down the street. 'What did that man find?' asked the friend of the devil. 'He discovered truth' said the devil. 'That is going to be a problem for you' stated the devil's friend. 'Not at all' responded the devil 'I'm going to help him organise it' J Krishnamurti.

I maintain that Truth is a pathless land, and you cannot approach it by any path whatsoever, by any religion, by any sect. That is my point of view, and I adhere to that absolutely and unconditionally. Truth, being limitless, unconditioned, unapproachable by any path whatsoever, cannot be organised; nor should any organisation be formed to lead or coerce people along any particular path. If you first understand that, then you will see how impossible it is to organise a belief. A belief is purely an individual matter, and you cannot and must not organise it. If you do, it becomes dead, crystallised; it becomes a creed, a sect, a religion, to be imposed on others.

This is what everyone throughout the world is attempting to do. Truth is narrowed down and made a plaything for those who are weak, for those who are only momentarily discontented. Truth cannot be brought down, rather the individual must make the effort to ascend to it. You cannot bring the mountain-top to the valley....

If an organisation be created for this purpose, it becomes a crutch, a weakness, a bondage, and must cripple the individual, and prevent him from growing, from establishing his uniqueness, which lies in the discovery for himself of that absolute, unconditioned Truth.

You are all depending for your spirituality on someone else, for your happiness on someone else, for your enlightenment on someone else.... when I say look within yourselves for the enlightenment, for the glory, for the purification, and for the incorruptibility of the self, not one of you is willing to do it. There may be a few, but very, very few. So why have an organisation?....

No man from outside can make you free; nor can organised worship, nor the immolation of yourselves for a cause, make you free; nor can forming yourselves into an organisation, nor throwing yourselves into work, make you free. You use a typewriter to write letters, but you do not put it on an alter and worship it. But that is what you are doing when organisations become your chief concern. 'How many members are there in it?' That is the first question I am asked by all newspaper reporters. 'How many followers have you? By their number we shall judge whether what you say is true or false.' I do not know how many there are. I am not concerned with that. If there were even one man who had been set free, that were enough....


Again, you have the idea that only certain people hold the key to the Kingdom of Happiness. No one holds it. No one has the authority to hold that key. That key is your own self, and in the development and the purification and in the incorruptibility of that self alone is the Kingdom of Eternity....

You have been accustomed to being told how far you have advanced, what is your spiritual status. How childish! Who but yourself can tell you if you are incorruptible?....

But those who really desire to understand, who are looking to find that which is eternal, without a beginning and without an end, will walk together with greater intensity, will be a danger to everything that is unessential, to unrealities, to shadows. And they will concentrate, they will become the flame, because they understand. Such a body we must create, and that is my purpose. Because of that true friendship - which you do not seem to know - there will be real co-operation on the part of each one. And this not because of authority, not because of salvation, but because you really understand, and hence are capable of living in the eternal. This is a greater thing than all pleasure, than all sacrifice.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i16OMrwxsm8&feature=related
"

THE reason why some Black Men Won't Date Or Marry Black Women

Source: www.youtube.com
Malcolm X explaining the mentality behind why Black men love white women and white people in general.
'if you do not understand white supremacy(racism)------what it is, and how it works-------everything else that you understand, will only confuse you.' ...neely fuller jr. According to Neely fuller jr.

There are 3 types of people in the known universe: 1. White people

2. Non-white people


3. White supremacists (racist)


THE FACT THAT NO WHITE PERSON IS SUBJECT TO WHITE SUPREMACY(RACISM) GREATLY CONFUSES MANY NON-WHITE PEOPLE

Explanation:
1. 'White' people are people who classify themselves as 'white', and have been classified as 'white', and who generally function as 'white' in all of the nine major areas of activity, including economics, education, entertainment, labor, law, politics, religion, sex, and war.


2. Non' white' people are people who have been classified as non'white', and/or who generally function as non'white' in their relationships withe each other, and withe people classified as 'white', in all of the nine major areas of activity, including economics, education, entertainment, labor, law, politics, religion, sex, and war.

3. White Supremacists (Racists) are people who classify themselves as 'white', and who generally function as 'white', and, who practice racial subjugation (based on 'white'-non'white' classifications) against people classified as non'white', at any time, in any place, in any one, or more of the nine major areas of activity, including economics, education, entertainment, labor, law, politics, religion, sex and war. Two basic problems among the people of the known universe:

1. Lack of knowledge and understanding of the reason for existence, and/or for non-existence.


2. Racism (White Supremacy). Explanation: Every 'problem' among the people of the known universe can, today, be traced to:

1. A lack of knowledge and understanding of the reason for existence and/or non-existence, compounded by and promoted by


2. The practice of Racism(White Supremacy). This is true in all areas of activity among people, including economics, education, entertainment, labor, law, politics, religion, sex, and war. Two basic 'classes' of people in the known universe:

1. The powerful 'class'(White Supremacist)

2. The powerless 'class'( all non-white people, AND those White People who are not White Supremacists) Explanation: Since the establishment of White Supremacy(Racism)among the people of the known universe, the terms 'upper class', have become so meaningless that to use such terms to describe any people does not promote justice, but serves only to promote great confusion.

It is therefore best not to use such terms to describe any people now in existence in the known universe. Under White Supremacy, and/or, as long as White Supremacy exists, the best and most accurate way to describe people by using the category of 'class' is to describe their power relationship to each other.

By so doing, all White People who practice White Supremacy(Racism) must be recognised as the only people in the known universe who are the 'powerful class'.

All non-white people, being subject to the 'powerful class' are, therefore, the 'powerless class'.

In addition, those white persons who do not practice White Supremacy are also the 'powerless class'. these White People who do not practice
White Supremacy are not subject to the White Supremacists ('the powerful class').

THE FACT THAT NO WHITE PERSON IS SUBJECT TO WHITE SUPREMACY(RACISM) GREATLY CONFUSES MANY NON-WHITE PEOPLE.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F8TsnaOAPT8&playnext_from=TL&videos=_UXVLeBV9As&feature=recentf
"

Black and Missing but Not Forgotten