Have an account?

Search This Blog

Monday, May 24, 2010

Top 10 Things You Thought Were Black-Owned But Aren’t

Source: newsone.com
var impressionPostSlug = 'top-10-things-you-thought-were-black-owned-but-arent'; var impressionPostId = '533285'; var impressionPostCategory = 'nation';
Thought George Foreman grill was black owned??? It’s not…click more to see what made the list of 10 Things You Thought Were Black Owned
10 BET Networks-As of 2003 BET is owned by Viacom
9 Def Jam Records-Owned by Universal Musical Group
8 Marc Ecko
7 Jimmy Jazz
6 Essence Magazine-Owned by Time Inc
5 The Game (television show)
4 George Foreman Grill-The owner just used George’s name to name his grill.
3 Church’s Chicken
2 T.V One
1 SoftSheen Carson-Owned by L’Oreal
http://newsone.com/nation/news-one-staff/top-10-things-you-thought-were-black-owned-but-arent/
"

Homosexuality in Ancient Greece : The Truth

Source: www.youtube.com
If you want to read it in text form, follow this link: http://www.freewebs.com/lesgaybitrans/blog.htm?blogentryid=4149982 Other interesting links: http://www.livius.org/ho-hz/homosexuality/homosexuality.html ...
Pederasty or paederasty

(US: /ˈpɛdəræsti/, UK: /ˈpiːdəræsti/) is a (usually erotic) relationship between an older man and an adolescent boy outside his immediate family. The word pederasty derives from Greek (paiderastia) 'love of children' or 'love of boys',[1] a compound derived from παῖς (pais) 'child, boy' and ἐραστής (erastēs) 'lover'.Historically, pederasty has existed as a variety of customs and practices within different cultures. The status of pederasty has changed over the course of history, at times considered an ideal and at other times a crime.In the history of Europe, its most structured cultural manifestation was Athenian pederasty, and became most prominent in the 6th century BC. Greek pederasty's various forms were the subject of philosophic debates in which the carnal type was unfavorably compared with erotic yet spiritual and moderate forms.The legal status of pederasty in most countries is currently determined by whether or not the boy has reached the local age of consent. When illegal, law enforcement generally treats it as a form of child sexual abuse.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pederasty
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PzuejhuPCN8&feature=fvw
"

Pederasty, a Custom of Ancient Greece

Source: www.truthtree.com
Love and sexual relationships between young men and pubescent boys were accepted in Ancient Greece
The role and value of homosexuality in and to classical Mediterranean culture and society has only recently received significant study. Modern American society generally regards homosexuality as, at best, an intriguing subculture that often provides stock for humorists and satirists, or, at worst, a menacing counterculture that at times threatens impressionable adolescents with irreparable harm. Yet, homosexuality has not always been an aspect of 'others.' Ancient Greeks acknowledged homosexuality as an important tool in boys’ education. They institutionalized and regulated its practices within their law codes. True, opinions about it varied, but few aspects of any culture have ever stood without debate, both popular and forensic. Their homosexuality, almost universally intergenerational, resembled what modern societies call pederasty rather than homosexuality between adults. 1 It was an anomalous experiment in the education of youth.

Fathers of the middle classes and higher sent their sons to schools to learn mathematics and literacy using the alphabet adopted from Phoenicians by the middle of the ninth century BC. Students 12 and older also studied poetry, drama, music, history (after Herodotus [484 – 425 BC] and Thucydides [460 – 400 BC]) and athletics, which they practiced in the nude. Athletics included wrestling, foot races, the running long jump, javelin and discus throwing, and performance on hanging rings and parallel bars. 2 Most boys in general eagerly trained in athletics in hopes of attaining competitive levels for the Olympic games. If they could not win or compete in athletics, they may still have hoped for one of the prizes awarded for physical beauty.

At first, students learned athleticism outdoors at a dromos (an outdoor track for athletic performances). Later, schools and academies (for 'advanced' education in philosophy) built separate buildings, a gymnasium ('place to be nude'), dedicated to athletics, or a palaistra, a separate wrestling school. They also constructed viewing stands. Spectators came to watch not only regular games of competition, but also the actual training of pubescent youth and adolescents in the course of their daily education. Because women taught domestic duties to their daughters at home, viewing stands held only men, gymnasia and dromoi only nude boys. Schoolmasters cautioned naked students sitting trackside at dromoi to keep one leg forward to lessen the temptation to spectators and to smooth the sand when they stood up in order to obliterate the impression their genitals may have left. Furthermore, after their lessons in athletics concluded, boys did not wash below their navels, 4 for spectators also had access to dressing rooms, and the sight of boys washing their pubic areas would have tormented guests overbearingly. Continuing in their recognition of the appeal of young naked boys, gymnasia and palaistrae named one boy their most beautiful.


Ancient Greece had unofficial and unwritten rules enforcing decorous behavior at dromoi or in gymnasia and especially for relationships that at times started there, much as modern society has rules for how teenage sons of socialites must 'court and spark' their romantic interests. 5 Spectators normally came from the leisured moneyed class, young sons of leading citizens, for the working classes could scarcely afford the necessary leisure time. Occasionally one of those young scions of the social elite might take a favor to a particular boy in training. The young man might approach the boy after classes ended for the day, or he might send an intermediary to give his name and a message to the boy.

If the boy initially expressed no interest in meeting and getting to know the man, then the man could 'stalk' the boy, at first discreetly and silently following him from a respectful distance, gradually getting closer to him to beg him for favors. Whatever the man did, though, he must not touch the boy without the boy’s invitation or approval or, at the least, his acquiescence. Touching made the man liable to hubris, arrogant disregard of the law that led a person to mistreat another for his own satisfaction or to increase his status among his peers and betters (those of higher social class than himself). Hubris was a capital crime, and even the slightest touching of an unwilling boy opened a man to the charge. Cases of hubris brought to trial, of course, usually involved far more than slight touching.

On the other hand, if the boy showed an interest in returning the young man’s attention, the two started a friendship. The young man in such a relationship took the responsibility to teach the boy things that schools did not teach—moral rectitude, citizenship, patriotism to the polis, honesty, integrity, courage, etc. The friendship made the boy the eromenos of the man, who was the erastes (crudely, 'lover-boy' and 'boy-lover,' respectively) of the boy. Thereafter, they could appear in public and at social affairs as a pair.

The root 'eros' of both words, 'erastes' and 'eromenos,' referred to love that can have a satisfied resolution. 'Lust' comes closer than 'love' to how the ancient Greeks understood eros, neither mutual nor requited. Carnal knowledge satisfied eros of this kind. Eros also applied to, for instance, desire for victory, power, money, or returning home from travels or a sojourn. Philos, on the other hand, signified intellectual love, as for art or knowledge—philosopher—or a mutual respect between or among people, as within a close-knit family or a group of friends. Philos could be mutual and requited. 6 The love an erastes (plural erastai) felt for his eromenos (plural eromenoi) usually started as one-sided eros when he first saw the beautiful, naked boy, but at times, it developed into mutual philos after the pedagogical process had begun.


After a time of teaching his eromenos, an erastes offered the boy a gift. Exotic birds and plants were the most popular kinds of gifts, for they were rare and wondrous, expensive imports from distant foreign lands like equatorial Africa or India. Like the massive amount of available leisure time, the expense of the gift prohibited young men from lower economic classes from pursuing boys in the manner of the more financially capable. An eromenos might not accept a gift if it were not sufficiently rare or expensive.
http://www.truthtree.com/pederasty.shtml
"

Ashra Kwesi Explains the Origin of Adam & Eve Story at the Ramesseum in Kemet (Egypt)

Source: www.youtube.com
This is an authorized video, produced and selected by Ashra Kwesi and his company, Kemet Nu Productions for viewing on YouTube. Brother Kwesi provides an eye-witness account at the Ramesseum in Kemet (Egypt) and explains the origin of ancient African spiritual concepts now used by the western world....
Refuting the Myth of Adam and Eve
by Ras Tyehimba
There is a lot of important information that though cannot be reasonably disputed, is not incorporated fully into the mainstream body of information that comes from mainstream media and the formal education system. One area of subjugated information has to do with the earliest beginnings of humanity. The misinformation and confusion aroundthese earliest beginnings can be attributed to the pervasiveness of Judeo-Christianity. If one is to follow the Bible the age of the earth and humanity are approximately 6000-9000 years old. Understanding historical realities is made even more difficult when attempts are made to reduce the billions of years of earth's life forms into a mere 7000 year span as articulated by the Bible.

Can Christianity be debunked in a single question?
The people at Rationalist.war, think so.' I want to articulate their question,and you be the judge it this debunks christianity. St.Paul and his epistles to romans says that Jesus sacrificial death was required by God to atone for the original sin.'
The original sin being that of "Adams." But we know the story of Adam & Eve to be pure "fiction", although Paul thought it to be a factual story two thousand of years ago",which ultimately means, Jesus died for "absolutely" No "Reason"!
How do so called modernized Christians who reject a creation myth reconcile this fact?Why did God have to forgive our sin by sacrificing himself ,in human form in such a Grotesque manner,To write the wrongs of a person that never existed?
Evolution proves that the Adam & Eve story is nothing but at best an (Allegorical Fairy tale) since we know man do not come from a form of dirt,but from precursor "primates".... And women did not come from a "Rib"..... does this question debunk christianity in one failed swoop?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dxilks2HNQ8
"

Richard Dawkins - Morality, Old Testament, and Adam & Eve

Source: www.youtube.com
Richard Dawkins bringing up morality, the Old Testament, and the fallacy of Adam & Eve. Excerpt from 'Root of All Evil?: The Virus of Faith'
The God of the Old Testament is arguably the most unpleasant character in all fiction: jealous and proud of it; a petty, unjust, unforgiving control-freak; a vindictive, bloodthirsty ethnic cleanser; a misogynistic, homophobic, racist, infanticidal, genocidal, filicidal, pestilential, megalomaniacal, sadomasochistic, capriciously malevolent bully.

Kill Followers of Other Religions.
1) If your own full brother, or your son or daughter, or your beloved wife, or you intimate friend, entices you secretly to serve other gods, whom you and your fathers have not known, gods of any other nations, near at hand or far away, from one end of the earth to the other: do not yield to him or listen to him, nor look with pity upon him, to spare or shield him, but kill him. Your hand shall be the first raised to slay him; the rest of the people shall join in with you. You shall stone him to death, because he sought to lead you astray from the Lord, your God, who brought you out of the land of Egypt, that place of slavery. And all Israel, hearing of this, shall fear and never do such evil as this in your midst. (Deuteronomy 13:7-12 NAB)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p7XnKjxp_5w
"

Dr. Yosef ben-Jochannan - Adam & Eve

Source: www.youtube.com
Jewels!
'African-Americans have not yet learn that no other people have continued worshipping another's God, especially their slave master's god or gods and freed themselves from cultural and physical genocide. Why should Africans and African-Americans be the only exception to this historic reality?' Dr. Ben

St.Paul and his epistles to romans says that Jesus sacrificial death was required by God to atone for the original sin."The original sin being that of "Adams." But we know the story of Adam & Eve to be pure "fiction", although Paul thought it to be a factual story two thousand of years ago",which ultimately means, Jesus died for "absolutely" No "Reason"!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pGxazSX1__Y
"

57 Ancient Tombs With Mummies Unearthed in Egypt - AOL News

Source: www.aolnews.com
CAIRO (May 23) -- Archeologists have unearthed 57 ancient Egyptian tombs, most of which hold an ornately painted wooden sarcophagus with a mummy inside, Egypt\'s Supreme Council of Antiquities said Sunday.
Carl Sagan Quotes Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.

“You can't convince a believer of anything; for their belief is not based on evidence, it's based on a deep seated need to believe”

“Skeptical scrutiny is the means, in both science and religion, by which deep insights can be winnowed from deep nonsense”

57 Ancient Tombs With Mummies Unearthed in Egypt

CAIRO (May 23) -- Archeologists have unearthed 57 ancient Egyptian tombs, most of which hold an ornately painted wooden sarcophagus with a mummy inside, Egypt's Supreme Council of Antiquities said Sunday.

The oldest tombs date back to around 2750 B.C. during the period of Egypt's first and second dynasties, the council said in a statement. Twelve of the tombs belong the 18th dynasty which ruled Egypt during the second millennium B.C.

The discovery throws new light on Egypt's ancient religions, the council said.


Egypt's archaeology chief, Zahi Hawass, said the mummies dating to the 18th dynasty are covered in linen decorated with religious texts from the Book of the Dead and scenes featuring ancient Egyptian deities.

Abdel Rahman El-Aydi, head of the archaeological mission that made the discovery, said some of the tombs are decorated with religious texts that ancient Egyptians believed would help the deceased to cross through the underworld.

El-Aydi said one of the oldest tombs is almost completely intact, with all of its funerary equipment and a wooden sarcophagus containing a mummy wrapped in linen.

In 31 tombs dating to around 2030-1840 B.C, archeologists discovered scenes of different ancient Egyptian deities, such as the falcon-headed Horus, Hathor, Khnum and Amun, decorating some of the tombs.

The council said the findings were unearthed at Lahoun, in Fayoum, some 70 miles (100 kilometers) south of Cairo.

Last year, some 53 stone tombs dating back to various ancient periods were found in the area.
Filed under: World

http://www.aolnews.com/world/article/57-ancient-tombs-with-mummies-unearthed-in-egypt/19488254?icid=main|main|dl1|link5|http%3A%2F%2Fwww.aolnews.com%2Fworld%2Farticle%2F57-ancient-tombs-with-mummies-unearthed-in-egypt%2F19488254
"

Can Christianity be debunked in a single question?

Source: www.youtube.com
This video presents a question apparently forumated by the 'Rationalists', that challenges the very foundations of Christianity and might even debunk it logically in total?!
Can Christianity be debunked in a single question?

The people at Rationalist.war, think so.' I want to articulate their question,and you be the judge it this debunks christianity. St.Paul and his epistles to romans says that Jesus sacrificial death was required by God to atone for the original sin.'

The original sin being that of "Adams." But we know the story of Adam & Eve to be pure "fiction", although Paul thought it to be a factual story two thousand of years ago",which ultimately means, Jesus died for "absolutely" No "Reason"!

How do so called modernized Christians who reject a creation myth reconcile this fact?Why did God have to forgive our sin by sacrificing himself ,in human form in such a Grotesque manner,To write the wrongs of a person that never existed?

Evolution proves that the Adam & Eve story is nothing but at best an (Allegorical Fairy tale) since we know man do not come from a form of dirt,but from precursor "primates".... And women did not come from a "Rib"..... does this question debunk christianity in one failed swoop?http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yaJ9196ziTE
"

Introduction to Colonialism in Africa

Source: www.youtube.com
An introduction to the colonization of Africa by European imperial powers such as France and Great Britain, and an explanation of how the 'Scramble for Africa' led to the First World War.
Under the cloak of (CHRISTIANITY) it speaks of: Advocates for:Social Control overall people and( all resources) World Federation and Parliament International Court,and, Police Force,Goals:Community (Safe, Sanitary, Whole some, moral)Industrial (Disappearance of class distinctions) National(Nations welfare, every person must do some useful work)International(World Consciousness, Intl Mind, World Patriotism, Destruction of every arbitrary powerthat can separately disturb the peace of the world.

The Scramble for Africa, also known as the Race for Africa, resulted in occupation and annexation of African territory by European powers during the New Imperialism period, between the 1880s and the First World War in 1914.As a result of the heightened tension between European states in the last quarter of the 19th century, the partitioning of Africa may be seen as a way for the Europeans to eliminate the threat of a Europe-wide war over Africa.[1]Popular ideas in the 19th century also aided the partitioning of Africa. The eugenics movement and racism helped to foster European expansionist policy.[citation needed]The last 20 years of the nineteenth century saw transition from ‘informal imperialism’ of control through military influence and economic dominance to that of direct rule.[2] Attempts to mediate imperial competition, such as the Berlin Conference (1884 - 1885), failed to establish definitively the competing powers' claims

Opening of the continent


David Livingstone, early explorer of the interior of Africa.European exploration and exploitation of Africa had begun in earnest at the end of the 18th century. By 1835, Europeans had mapped most of northwestern Africa. Among the most famous of the European explorers were David Livingstone and Serpa Pinto[citation needed], both of whom mapped the vast interior of Southern Africa and Central Africa. Arduous expeditions in the 1850s and 1860s by Richard Burton, John Speke and James Grant located the great central lakes and the source of the Nile. By the end of the 19th century, Europeans had charted the Nile from its source, traced the courses of the Niger, Congo and Zambezi Rivers, and realized the vast resources of Africa.However, European nations controlled only 10 percent of the continent. The most important holdings were Algeria, held by France; the Cape Colony, held by the United Kingdom; and Angola and Mozambique, held by Portugal.Technological advancement facilitated overseas expansionism. Industrialisation brought about rapid advancements in transportation and communication, especially in the forms of steam navigation, railways, and telegraphs. Medical advances also were important, especially medicines for tropical diseases. The development of quinine, an effective treatment for malaria, enabled vast expanses of the tropics to be accessed by Europeans.[edit]
UNDERSTANDING WHITE SUPREMACY'

The events which transpired five thousand years ago; Five years ago or five minutes ago, have determined what will happen five minutes from now; five years From now or five thousand years from now. All history is a current event.' Dr. John Henrik Clarke'

if you do not understand white supremacy(racism)------what it is, and how it works-------everything else that you understand, will only confuse you.' ...neely fuller jr. According to neely fuller jr., there are 3 types of people in the known universe: 1. White people 2. Non-white people 3. White supremacists (racist) Explanation: 1. 'White' people are people who classify themselves as 'white', and have been classified as 'white', and who generally function as 'white' in all of the nine major areas of activity, including economics, education, entertainment, labor, law, politics, religion, sex, and war.


Meeting at the Berlin residence of Chancellor Otto von Bismarck in 1884, the foreign ministers of fourteen European powers and the United States established ground rules for the future exploitation of the 'dark continent.' Africans were not invited or made privy to their decisions.

1884-1885 - Berlin West African Conference carves Africa into spheres of control
In the second half of the nineteenth century, after more than four centuries of contact, the European powers finally laid claim to virtually all of Africa. Parts of the continent had been 'explored,' but now representatives of European governments and rulers arrived to create or expand African spheres of influence for their patrons. Competition was intense. Spheres of influence began to crowd each other. It was time for negotiation, and in late 1884 a conference was convened in Berlin to sort things out. This conference laid the groundwork for the now familiar politico-geographical map of Africa.
In November 1884, the imperial chancellor and architect of the German Empire, Otto von Bismarck, convened a conference of 14 states (including the United States) to settle the political partitioning of Africa. Bismarck wanted not only to expand German spheres of influence in Africa but also to play off Germany's colonial rivals against one another to the Germans' advantage. Of these fourteen nations, France, Germany, Great Britain, and Portugal were the major players in the conference, controlling most of colonial Africa at the time.
The Berlin Conference was Africa's undoing in more ways than one. The colonial powers superimposed their domains on the African Continent. By the time Africa regained its independence after the late 1950s, the realm had acquired a legacy of political fragmentation that could neither be eliminated nor made to operate satisfactorily. The African politico-geographical map is thus a permanent liability that resulted from the three months of ignorant, greedy acquisitiveness during a period when Europe's search for minerals and markets had become insatiable.
The French dominated most of West Africa, and the British East and Southern Africa. The Belgians acquired the vast territory that became The Congo. The Germans held four colonies, one in each of the realm's regions. The Portuguese held a small colony in West Africa and two large ones in Southern Africa.
After colonial rule was firmly established in Africa, the only change in possessions came after World War I. Germany's four colonies were placed under the League of Nations, which established a mandate system for other colonizers to administer the territories.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CM2Xa12YsX0&feature=related
"

Invisible Empire A New World Order Defined Full (Order it at Infowars.com)

Source: www.youtube.com
Jason Bermas presents Invisible Empire: A New World Order Defined produced by Alex Jones. The film can be ordered here http://infowars-shop.stores.yahoo.net/inemnewwoord.html
Under the cloak of (CHRISTIANITY)
UNDERSTANDING WHITE SUPREMACY
'The events which transpired five thousand years ago; Five years ago or five minutes ago, have determined what will happen five minutes from now; five years From now or five thousand years from now. All history is a current event.' Dr. John Henrik Clarke
'if you do not understand white supremacy(racism)------what it is, and how it works-------everything else that you understand, will only confuse you.' ...neely fuller jr.
According to neely fuller jr., there are 3 types of people in the known universe:
1. White people 2. Non-white people 3. White supremacists (racist) Explanation: 1. 'White' people are people who classify themselves as 'white', and have been classified as 'white', and who generally function as 'white' in all of the nine major areas of activity, including economics, education, entertainment, labor, law, politics, religion, sex, and war.


Under the cloak of (CHRISTIANITY) it speaks of: Advocates for:Social Control overall people and( all resources) World Federation and Parliament International Court,and, Police Force,Goals:Community (Safe, Sanitary, Whole some, moral)Industrial (Disappearance of class distinctions) National(Nations welfare, every person must do some useful work)International(World Consciousness, Intl Mind, World Patriotism, Destruction of every arbitrary powerthat can separately disturb the peace of the world.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NO24XmP1c5E&feature=player_embedded
"

Invisible Empire - A New World Order Defined - Bibliography

Source: www.scribd.com
This is an excellent video by Jason Bermas on the NWO. Produced by Alex Jones. Links to Video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NO24XmP1c5E&feature=player_embedded http://infowars-shop.stores.yahoo.net/inemnewwoord.html This is a revision in PDF format with fully functional hyperlinks. ***************...
Under the cloak of (CHRISTIANITY)

UNDERSTANDING WHITE SUPREMACY
'The events which transpired five thousand years ago; Five years ago or five minutes ago, have determined what will happen five minutes from now; five years From now or five thousand years from now. All history is a current event.' Dr. John Henrik Clarke

'if you do not understand white supremacy(racism)------what it is, and how it works-------everything else that you understand, will only confuse you.' ...neely fuller jr.

According to neely fuller jr., there are 3 types of people in the known universe:
1. White people 2. Non-white people 3. White supremacists (racist)
Explanation:
1. 'White' people are people who classify themselves as 'white', and have been classified as 'white', and who generally function as 'white' in all of the nine major areas of activity, including economics, education, entertainment, labor, law, politics, religion, sex, and war.

Under the cloak of (CHRISTIANITY) it speaks of: Advocates for:Social Control overall people and( all resources) World Federation and Parliament International Court,and, Police Force,Goals:Community (Safe, Sanitary, Whole some, moral)Industrial (Disappearance of class distinctions) National(Nations welfare, every person must do some useful work)International(World Consciousness, Intl Mind, World Patriotism, Destruction of every arbitrary powerthat can separately disturb the peace of the world.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/30309168/Invisible-Empire-A-New-World-Order-Defined-Bibliography
"

We Are Here: The Pale Blue Dot

Source: www.youtube.com
The Pale Blue Dot: The picture of Earth from 4 billion miles away. As told by Carl Sagan through some my favorite films set to the music of Mogwai. http://palebluefilms.com/?p=11 Edit: I've had some requests for subtitles from people abroad. ...
The Pale Blue Dot/Carl Sagan.

The spacecraft was a long way from home.
I thought it would be a good idea, just after Saturn, to have them take one last glance homeward. From Saturn, the Earth would appear too small for Voyager to make out any detail. Our planet would be just a point of light, a lonely pixel hardly distinguishable from the other points of light Voyager would see: nearby planets, far off suns. But precisely because of the obscurity of our world thus revealed, such a picture might be worth having.
It had been well understood by the scientists and philosophers of classical antiquity that the Earth was a mere point in a vast, encompassing cosmos—but no one had ever seen it as such. Here was our first chance, and perhaps also our last for decades to come.
So, here they are: a mosaic of squares laid down on top of the planets in a background smattering of more distant stars. Because of the reflection of sunlight off the spacecraft, the Earth seems to be sitting in a beam of light, as if there were some special significance to this small world; but it’s just an accident of geometry and optics. There is no sign of humans in this picture: not our reworking of the Earth’s surface; not our machines; not ourselves. From this vantage point, our obsession with nationalisms is nowhere in evidence. We are too small. On the scale of worlds, humans are inconsequential: a thin film of life on an obscure and solitary lump of rock and metal.
Consider again that dot. That’s here. That’s home. That’s us. On it, everyone you love, everyone you know, everyone you’ve ever heard of, every human being who ever was lived out their lives. The aggregate of all our joys and sufferings; thousands of confident religions, ideologies and economic doctrines; every hunter and forager; every hero and coward; every creator and destroyer of civilizations; every king and peasant, every young couple in love; every mother and father; hopeful child; inventor and explorer; every teacher of morals; every corrupt politician; every supreme leader; every superstar; every saint and sinner in the history of our species, lived there—on a mote of dust suspended in a sunbeam.
The Earth is a very small stage in a vast cosmic arena.
Think of the endless cruelties visited by the inhabitants of one corner of this pixel on the scarcely distinguishable inhabitants of some other corner. How frequent their misunderstandings; how eager they are to kill one another; how fervent their hatreds. Think of the rivers of blood spilled by all those generals and emperors so that in glory and triumph they could become the momentary masters of a fraction of a dot. Our posturings, our imagined self-importance, the delusion that we have some privileged position in the universe, are challenged by this point of pale light.
Our planet is a lonely speck in the great enveloping cosmic dark. In our obscurity—in all this vastness—there is no hint that help will come from elsewhere to save us from ourselves. Like it or not, for the moment, the Earth is where we make our stand.
It has been said that astronomy is a humbling and character-building experience. There is perhaps no better demonstration of the folly of human conceits than this distant image of our tiny world. It underscores our responsibility to deal more kindly with one another, and to preserve and cherish the only home we’ve ever known.
The pale blue dot.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2pfwY2TNehw&feature=related
"

Neil deGrasse Tyson DESTROYS intelligent design

Source: www.youtube.com
Send this to your friends who think that there is an intelligent designer.
Intelligent Design

Another practice that isn't science is embracing ignorance. Yet it's fundamental to the philosophy of intelligent design: I don't know what this is.... So it must be the product of a higher intelligence.Death By Black Hole, p. 361


Science is a philosophy of discovery.Intelligent design is a philosophy of ignorance.Death By Black Hole, p. 361

This present-day version of God of the gaps goes by a fresh name: intelligent design....Instead, why not tally all those things whose design...reflect[s] the absence of intelligence?Death By Black Hole, p. 359

Regarding the intelligent design of the human body:And what comedian configured the region between our legs—an entertainment complex built around a sewage system?Death By Black Hole, p. 360


Spirituality

Great scientific minds, from Claudius Ptolemy of the second century to Isaac Newton of the seventeenth, invested their formidable intellects in attempts to deduce the nature of the universe from the statements and philosophies contained in religious writings.... Had any of these efforts worked, science and religion today might be one and the same. But they are not.

They [scientists of centuries past] call on God only from the lonely and precarious edge of incomprehension. Where they feel certain about their explanations, however, God gets hardly a mention.

Regarding a seventeenth-century scientist's invocation of the Almighty to explain phenomena:Today secular philosophers call that kind of divine invocation God of the gaps—which comes in handy, because there has never been a shortage of gaps in people's knowledge.

[A]s they are currently practiced, there is no common ground between science and religion....Although just as in hostage negotiations, it's probably best to keep both sides talking to each other.

Whenever people have used religious documents to make accurate predictions about our base knowledge of the physical world, they have been famously wrong.


I simply go with what works. And what works is the healthy skepticism embodied in the scientific method. Believe me, if the Bible had ever been shown to be a rich source of scientific answers and enlightenment, we would be mining it daily for cosmic discovery.

Regarding the unanswered questions the religious community poses to science:We should not be ashamed of not having answers to all questions yet...I'm perfectly happy staring somebody in the face saying, I don't know yet, and we've got top people working on it. The moment you feel compelled to provide an answer, then you're doing the same thing that the religious community does: providing answers to every possible question.

I don't have an issue with what you do in the church, but I'm going to be up in your face if you're going to knock on my science classroom and tell me they've got to teach what you're teaching in your Sunday school. Because that's when we're going to fight.

There's no tradition of scientists knocking down the Sunday school door, telling the preacher, That might not necessarily be true. That's never happened. There're no scientists picketing outside of churches.

If all that you see, do, measure and discover is the will of a deity, then ideas can never be proven wrong, you have no predictive power, and you are at a loss to understand the principles behind most of the fundamental interconnections of nature.

Once upon a time, people identified the god Neptune as the source of storms at sea. Today we call these storms hurricanes.... The only people who still call hurricanes acts of God are the people who write insurance forms.

It's quite literally true that we are star dust, in the highest exalted way one can use that phrase. ...I bask in the majesty of the cosmos. I use words, compose sentences that sound like the sentences I hear out of people that had revelation of Jesus, who go on their pilgrimages to Mecca.

Not only are we in the universe, the universe is in us. I don't know of any deeper spiritual feeling than what that brings upon me.

So what is true for life itself is no less true for the universe: knowing where you came from is no less important than knowing where you are going.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ISg6j7BF02Q&feature=related
"

NWO for Dummies with William Cooper

Source: www.youtube.com
Excerpt from documentary 'Hour of Our Time: The Legacy of William Cooper' or more accurately, 'The Mystery Babylon Series' from his short wave radio broadcast that bears the name 'Hour of Our Time.' Here, Bill Cooper explains what is behind all of the world's secret societies. ...
NWO for Dummies with William Cooper

Because christ also called himself the morning star. But i have been told those who have been initiated into the mystery schools that Christ and Lucifer are one and the same being. What you believe of course is your own business and is not my attention to make you believe anything,but rather to impart to you what i have learned over many,many years of study into the secrets of those who worship the ancient mystery religions,in secret for thousands of years.

I do not advise you,what you should believe or not 'believe.' but i do advise you that we all need to learn as much as we can about everything that we can, because one thing i have learned in my life,Is that most of what we have ever been taught (HAS BEEN A LIE)

And that who ever these people are, who are the priest,indepts,initiate,the mystery school.they are in control and they are shaping the future,and that future will effect all of us,so we have better learn as much about them as we can.


Bill Cooper's Mystery Babylon series transcribed into pdf format at MediaFire... http://www.mediafire.com/?qlmudbmky2y


[William Cooper]: That ’s right, folks, the new Aeon or the New Age. This, according to the Mystery Schools, is the perversion of Christianity. This is the theme of the Bible, God's Sun in his coming kingdom age, the new age of Aquarius. Now, what you choose to believe is your business. Remember, don’t get mad at me.

I am teaching you the Mystery Religion of ancient Babylon, and I am telling you right now many people practice this mystery religion in secret, and they hate Christians. They hate Christians because they believe that Christianity is a perversion of their religion, and thus is their enemy.

'When viewing the shimmering rays of sunlight on a body of water at dawn or sunset, [according to the Mystery Schools] one can still see today, how God's Sun 'walks on water.''

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K_c1hiwnrno&NR=1
"

Black and Missing but Not Forgotten